Haas Barbara, Jurkovich Gregory J, Wang Jin, Rivara Frederick P, Mackenzie Ellen J, Nathens Avery B
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan;208(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
Trauma patients who receive care at designated trauma centers have a decreased risk of death, but the processes of care that lead to improved outcomes are unknown. We set out to examine the relationship between trauma center care, rapidity of assessment and intervention, and mortality among trauma patients with indications for immediate operative intervention.
Data were collected from a multicenter prospective cohort study of adult patients cared for in trauma centers (TC) and nondesignated centers (NTC). From this cohort, we identified patients with two patterns of injury: hypotensive penetrating trauma (PT) and blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) with mass effect. Times from admission to relevant interventions were assessed, as were relative risks of in-hospital death in TC compared with NTC. Relative risks were adjusted for differences in case mix using propensity analysis.
Among 1,331 patients who met inclusion criteria, 23.5% died in hospital. Relative risk of death was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.86) among patients managed at TC compared with those admitted to NTC. This survival advantage was greatest among patients in the PT group managed at TC (relative risk: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.94). Relative risk of death at TC among patients in the TBI group was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.50 to 1.0). Within the first 24 hours of admission, however, there was no statistically significant difference between median times to radiographic assessment or operative intervention at TC as compared with other hospitals.
Risk of death is considerably lower among patients requiring early operative intervention if they are treated at a designated Level I trauma center. These outcomes are not a result of more rapid assessment and intervention alone, and emphasize the complex factors that contribute to the survival benefit of trauma center care.
在指定创伤中心接受治疗的创伤患者死亡风险降低,但导致预后改善的护理过程尚不清楚。我们着手研究创伤中心护理、评估和干预的速度与有立即手术干预指征的创伤患者死亡率之间的关系。
数据来自一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,该研究针对在创伤中心(TC)和非指定中心(NTC)接受治疗的成年患者。从该队列中,我们确定了两种损伤模式的患者:低血压穿透性创伤(PT)和有占位效应的钝性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。评估了从入院到相关干预的时间,以及与非指定中心相比,创伤中心患者的院内死亡相对风险。使用倾向分析对病例组合差异进行了相对风险调整。
在1331名符合纳入标准的患者中,23.5%在医院死亡。与入住非指定中心的患者相比,在创伤中心接受治疗的患者死亡相对风险为0.61(95%CI,0.43至0.86)。在创伤中心接受治疗的PT组患者中,这种生存优势最为明显(相对风险:0.43;95%CI,0.19至0.94)。TBI组患者在创伤中心的死亡相对风险为0.72(95%CI,0.50至1.0)。然而,在入院后的前24小时内,创伤中心与其他医院相比,影像学评估或手术干预的中位时间没有统计学上的显著差异。
如果在指定的一级创伤中心接受治疗,需要早期手术干预的患者死亡风险会显著降低。这些结果并非仅仅是更快的评估和干预的结果,强调了促成创伤中心护理生存益处的复杂因素。