Safavi Kyan C, Gaitanidis Apostolos, Breen Kerry, Seelen Mark, Raja Ali, Velmahos George C, Dunn Peter F
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Dec 30;5(1):e000607. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000607. eCollection 2020.
Emergency departments (EDs) at level 1 trauma centers are often overcrowded and deny ED-to-ED transfers from lower-tiered centers. Lack of access to timely level 1 care is associated with increased mortality. We evaluated the feasibility of a direct admission (DA) protocol as a method to increase timely access to a level 1 trauma center during periods of ED overcrowding.
During periods of ED overcrowding between 1 May and 31 December 2019, we admitted patients from referring EDs directly to the intensive care unit (ICU) or inpatient ward using the DA protocol. In a prospective comparative study design, we compared their outcomes to patients during the same period who were admitted through the ED when the ED was not overcrowded.
During periods of ED overcrowding, transfer was requested and clinically accepted for 28 patients, of which 23 (82.1%, age 63±20.3 years, men 52.2% men) were successfully admitted via the DA protocol. Five (17.9%) were not successfully transferred due to lack of available inpatient beds. During periods when the ED was not overcrowded, 106 patients (age 62.8±23.1 years, men 52.8%) were admitted via the ED. There were no morbidity or mortality events attributed to the DA process. Time to patient arrival was 2.7 hours (95% CI 2.3 to 3.1) in the DA cohort and 1.9 hours (95% CI 1.5 to 2.4) in the ED-to-ED cohort (p=0.104). Up-triage to the ICU within 24 hours was performed in only one patient (4.3%). In-hospital mortality did not differ (3 (13%) vs. 8 (7.6%), p=0.392).
The DA pathway is a feasible method to safely transfer patients from a referring ED to a higher-care trauma center when its ED is overcrowded.
Level III, care management.
一级创伤中心的急诊科常常人满为患,拒绝接收来自较低层级中心的急诊科间转运患者。无法及时获得一级护理与死亡率增加相关。我们评估了直接入院(DA)方案作为在急诊科过度拥挤期间增加及时进入一级创伤中心机会的一种方法的可行性。
在2019年5月1日至12月31日急诊科过度拥挤期间,我们使用DA方案将转诊急诊科的患者直接收治到重症监护病房(ICU)或住院病房。在一项前瞻性对照研究设计中,我们将他们的结局与同期急诊科未过度拥挤时通过急诊科入院的患者进行比较。
在急诊科过度拥挤期间,有28例患者被请求转运并被临床接受,其中23例(82.1%,年龄63±20.3岁,男性占52.2%)通过DA方案成功入院。5例(17.9%)因缺乏可用住院床位未成功转运。在急诊科未过度拥挤期间,106例患者(年龄62.8±23.1岁,男性占52.8%)通过急诊科入院。没有与DA流程相关的发病或死亡事件。DA队列中患者到达时间为2.7小时(95%CI 2.3至3.1),急诊科间转运队列中为1.9小时(95%CI 1.5至2.4)(p = 0.104)。仅1例患者(4.3%)在24小时内被升级分诊至ICU。住院死亡率无差异(3例(13%)对8例(7.6%),p = 0.392)。
DA途径是在其急诊科过度拥挤时将患者从转诊急诊科安全转运至更高护理级别的创伤中心的一种可行方法。
三级,护理管理。