• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧颞动脉活检诊断巨细胞动脉炎时不一致结果的发生率。

Rate of discordant findings in bilateral temporal artery biopsy to diagnose giant cell arteritis.

作者信息

Breuer Gabriel S, Nesher Gideon, Nesher Ronit

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Service, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School, PO Box 3235, Jerusalem, Israel 91031.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):794-6. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080792. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

DOI:10.3899/jrheum.080792
PMID:19228656
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine to what extent performing simultaneous bilateral temporal artery biopsies might increase the diagnostic sensitivity in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

In total 173 consecutive pathology reports of temporal artery biopsies were reviewed for histological findings by a single pathologist. The rate of discordance of biopsy results was calculated in patients with GCA.

RESULTS

Biopsies were performed bilaterally and simultaneously in 132 cases; 51 had positive results. In 38 the biopsy was positive on both sides (concordant results), while in 13 patients only one side was positive (discordant results), reaching a discordance rate of 13/51=0.255. Therefore 12.7% of the patients (one-half of the discordance rate) could have been misdiagnosed as biopsy-negative had a biopsy been done only unilaterally in those 51 cases.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that performing bilateral temporal artery biopsies increases the diagnostic sensitivity of the procedure by up to 12.7%, compared to unilateral biopsies.

摘要

目的

确定同时进行双侧颞动脉活检在多大程度上可能提高巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的诊断敏感性。

方法

由一名病理学家对总共173份连续的颞动脉活检病理报告进行组织学检查结果回顾。计算GCA患者活检结果的不一致率。

结果

132例患者进行了双侧同时活检;51例结果为阳性。38例双侧活检均为阳性(结果一致),而13例患者仅一侧为阳性(结果不一致),不一致率为13/51 = 0.255。因此,在这51例患者中,如果仅进行单侧活检,12.7%的患者(不一致率的一半)可能被误诊为活检阴性。

结论

这些数据表明,与单侧活检相比,进行双侧颞动脉活检可使该检查的诊断敏感性提高多达12.7%。

相似文献

1
Rate of discordant findings in bilateral temporal artery biopsy to diagnose giant cell arteritis.双侧颞动脉活检诊断巨细胞动脉炎时不一致结果的发生率。
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):794-6. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080792. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
2
Incidence of discordant temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎诊断中颞动脉活检不一致的发生率。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;49(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.12.008.
3
The efficacy of selective unilateral temporal artery biopsy versus bilateral biopsies for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.选择性单侧颞动脉活检与双侧活检对巨细胞动脉炎诊断的疗效比较。
J Rheumatol. 1988 Jun;15(6):997-1000.
4
[Diagnostic value of clinical signs in giant cell arteritis: analysis of 415 temporal artery biopsy findings].[临床体征在巨细胞动脉炎中的诊断价值:415例颞动脉活检结果分析]
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2002 Feb;153(1):3-12.
5
Temporal artery biopsy for giant cell arteritis.颞动脉活检用于巨细胞动脉炎的诊断。
J Rheumatol. 2005 Jul;32(7):1279-82.
6
Prevalence of a normal C-reactive protein with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.经活检证实的巨细胞动脉炎中C反应蛋白正常而红细胞沉降率升高的患病率。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1842-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.020. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
7
[Is the biopsy of the temporal artery necessary? A study of 204 biopsies].颞动脉活检有必要吗?对204例活检的研究
Rev Clin Esp. 1991 Nov;189(7):325-7.
8
Is temporal artery biopsy a worthwhile procedure?颞动脉活检是一项值得做的检查吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Jun;75(6):388-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03399.x.
9
Diagnostic value of the history and examination in giant cell arteritis: a clinical pathological study of 81 temporal artery biopsies.巨细胞动脉炎病史及体格检查的诊断价值:81例颞动脉活检的临床病理研究
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1793-6.
10
Proposal to decrease the number of negative temporal artery biopsies.减少颞动脉活检阴性数量的提议。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2007 Mar-Apr;36(2):111-8. doi: 10.1080/03009740600991646.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal artery biopsy in giant cell arteritis: clinical perspectives and histological patterns.巨细胞动脉炎的颞动脉活检:临床观点与组织学模式
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 25;11:1453462. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1453462. eCollection 2024.
2
Temporal Artery Biopsy for Diagnosing Giant Cell Arteritis: A Ten-year Review.颞动脉活检用于诊断巨细胞动脉炎:十年回顾
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020 Apr 6;15(2):201-209. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6738. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
3
Updates in the Diagnosis and Management of Giant Cell Arteritis.
巨细胞动脉炎的诊断与治疗进展。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Aug 8;19(9):68. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0982-3.
4
Giant cell arteritis: is the clinical spectrum of the disease changing?巨细胞动脉炎:疾病的临床谱在改变吗?
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1225-9.
5
Neural network and logistic regression diagnostic prediction models for giant cell arteritis: development and validation.巨细胞动脉炎的神经网络和逻辑回归诊断预测模型:开发与验证
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 21;13:421-430. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S193460. eCollection 2019.
6
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitides.大血管血管炎的诊断和鉴别诊断。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Feb;39(2):169-185. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4157-3. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Giant Cell Arteritis Associated Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: Sudden Vision Loss on the Contralateral Side of Headache.巨细胞动脉炎相关性动脉性前部缺血性视神经病变:头痛对侧突发视力丧失。
J Clin Neurol. 2018 Oct;14(4):577-579. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.577. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
The Utility of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Masked Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).彩色双功超声在巨细胞动脉炎诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性、盲法研究。(美国眼科学会论文)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2018 Jun 25;115:T9. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Temporal arteritis.颞动脉炎
Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;4(2):106-113. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e3182a9c62a.
10
Color duplex ultrasonography findings of temporal arteries in a case of giant cell arteritis: role in diagnosis and follow-up.巨细胞动脉炎病例中颞动脉的彩色双功超声检查结果:在诊断和随访中的作用
Open Access Rheumatol. 2017 Mar 15;9:55-59. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S110585. eCollection 2017.