Rath Claus-Dieter
Fondation Européenne pour la Psychanalyse.
Luzif Amor. 2008;21(42):8-36.
From 1920 on, in the Berlin Polyclinic many persons received psychoanalytic treatment by novices. Out of responsibility towards patients and in order to train and to correct beginning analysts, the procedure of "control analysis" was introduced. It has remained a central element of analytical training since, although there have been different ideas as to who was to exercise control and how and for which purpose it should be done. This paper examines Helene Deutsch's Viennese contribution, first presented at the 1927 Congress in Innsbruck and again at the first Four Countries Meeting in 1935, as compared to the positions brought forward by Max Eitingon (Berlin) and Vilma Kovács (Budapest). It highlights both the relation between training and control analysis and the difference between "control analysis" and "control of analysis". Control analysis as part of analytical training is to be distinguished from control analysis as part of the analyst's continuous formation during his or her whole working life.
从1920年起,在柏林综合诊所,许多人接受了新手的精神分析治疗。出于对患者的责任以及为了培训和纠正初入行的分析师,引入了“控制分析”程序。自那以后,它一直是分析培训的核心要素,尽管对于由谁来实施控制、如何实施以及出于何种目的实施存在不同观点。本文将海伦妮·多伊奇1927年在因斯布鲁克大会上首次提出、并于1935年在首次四国会议上再次提出的维也纳贡献,与马克斯·艾廷根(柏林)和维尔玛·科瓦奇(布达佩斯)提出的观点进行比较。它既突出了培训与控制分析之间的关系,也突出了“控制分析”与“对分析的控制”之间的差异。作为分析培训一部分的控制分析,应与作为分析师在其整个职业生涯中持续成长一部分的控制分析区分开来。