Watkins C Edward
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, PO Box 311280, Denton, TX 76203, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2013 Sep;73(3):254-70. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2013.15.
Psychoanalytic supervision is moving well into its 2nd century of theory, practice, and (to a limited extent) research. In this paper, I take a look at the pioneering first efforts to define psychoanalytic supervision and its importance to the psychoanalytic education process. Max Eitingon, the "almost forgotten man" of psychoanalysis, looms large in any such consideration. His writings or organizational reports were seemingly the first psychoanalytic published material to address the following supervision issues: rationale, screening, notes, responsibility, supervisee learning/personality issues, and the extent and length of supervision itself. Although Eitingon never wrote formally on supervision, his pioneering work in the area has continued to echo across the decades and can still be seen reflected in contemporary supervision practice. I also recognize the role of Karen Horney-one of the founders of the Berlin Institute and Poliklinik, friend of Eitingon, and active, vital participant in Eitingon's efforts-in contributing to and shaping the beginnings of psychoanalytic education.
精神分析督导已顺利步入其理论、实践(以及在有限程度上的研究)的第二个世纪。在本文中,我将审视定义精神分析督导及其对精神分析教育过程重要性的开创性早期努力。马克斯·艾廷根,这位精神分析领域“几乎被遗忘的人”,在任何此类考量中都显得极为突出。他的著作或组织报告似乎是最早发表的精神分析相关材料,涉及以下督导问题:基本原理、筛选、记录、责任、受督导者的学习/个性问题,以及督导本身的范围和时长。尽管艾廷根从未正式撰写过关于督导的内容,但他在该领域的开创性工作在数十年间持续产生影响,如今仍能在当代督导实践中看到其影子。我也认可卡伦·霍妮的作用——她是柏林精神分析研究所及诊疗所的创始人之一、艾廷根的朋友,也是艾廷根工作的积极且重要的参与者——她为精神分析教育的开端做出了贡献并塑造了其雏形。