• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制成本与控制漏洞:二者相互排斥吗?

Containing costs and containing bugs: are they mutually exclusive?

作者信息

Nicolau David P P

机构信息

Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Mar;15(2 Suppl):S12-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12
PMID:19236136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438171/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The overall health care costs for managing patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in U.S. hospitals is burdensome. While pharmacy costs comprise only a minor proportion of these costs, hospital length of stay (LOS) is the greatest contributor. Infections due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are also associated with increased overall health care cost. Therefore, strategies that aim to minimize antimicrobial resistance and reduce hospital LOS may have the greatest impact in reducing overall health care costs in managing patients with CAP.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how antimicrobial resistance can impact health care costs associated with CAP and review strategies to minimize the risk of resistance development while promoting appropriate antimicrobial therapy (including optimized dosing) and decreasing hospital LOS.

SUMMARY

Antimicrobial resistance can increase the risk of clinical failure and result in higher overall health care costs. Further development of antimicrobial resistance during therapy should, therefore, be minimized. This can be achieved through optimized antimicrobial dosing strategies- using a higher dose of concentration-dependent agents or prolonged infusion of time-dependent agents - that increase the probability of attaining pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets for eradication of the pathogen and hence successful clinical outcomes. Decreasing LOS must be a priority when attempting to reduce hospital costs. Active intravenous-to-oral switch therapy has been shown to effectively reduce LOS. Appropriate short-course regimens may also offer the opportunity for effective treatment while reducing or eliminating unnecessary antimicrobial exposure that not only reduces the potential for drug-related adverse events, but may also minimize the selection of resistant organisms.

CONCLUSION

Clinical failure and antimicrobial resistance can significantly increase the cost of managing patients with CAP, primarily by increasing LOS. Therefore, strategies should be employed to minimize the risk of resistance development and reduce LOS. These include early appropriate therapy, optimized dosing based on pharmacodynamic principles, and efficient IV-to-PO switch therapy when appropriate.

摘要

背景

在美国医院中,管理社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的总体医疗费用负担沉重。虽然药房费用仅占这些费用的一小部分,但住院时间(LOS)是最大的费用贡献因素。抗菌药物耐药病原体引起的感染也与总体医疗费用增加有关。因此,旨在尽量减少抗菌药物耐药性并缩短住院时间的策略可能对降低CAP患者管理中的总体医疗费用产生最大影响。

目的

评估抗菌药物耐药性如何影响与CAP相关的医疗费用,并审查在促进适当抗菌治疗(包括优化给药剂量)和缩短住院时间的同时尽量降低耐药性发展风险的策略。

总结

抗菌药物耐药性会增加临床治疗失败的风险,并导致更高的总体医疗费用。因此,应尽量减少治疗期间抗菌药物耐药性的进一步发展。这可以通过优化抗菌药物给药策略来实现——使用更高剂量的浓度依赖性药物或延长时间依赖性药物的输注时间——这会增加实现药代动力学-药效学目标以根除病原体并因此获得成功临床结果的可能性。在试图降低医院成本时,缩短住院时间必须是优先事项。积极的静脉给药至口服转换治疗已被证明可有效缩短住院时间。适当的短疗程方案也可能提供有效治疗的机会,同时减少或消除不必要的抗菌药物暴露,这不仅会降低药物相关不良事件的可能性,还可能最大限度地减少耐药菌的选择。

结论

临床治疗失败和抗菌药物耐药性会显著增加CAP患者的管理成本,主要是通过延长住院时间。因此,应采取策略尽量降低耐药性发展的风险并缩短住院时间。这些策略包括早期适当治疗、基于药效学原理的优化给药剂量,以及在适当时进行有效的静脉给药至口服转换治疗。

相似文献

1
Containing costs and containing bugs: are they mutually exclusive?控制成本与控制漏洞:二者相互排斥吗?
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Mar;15(2 Suppl):S12-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12.
2
Cost-effective approaches to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of resistance.耐药时代社区获得性肺炎的经济有效治疗方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(8):513-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220080-00002.
3
Comparative analysis of length of stay, total costs, and treatment success between intravenous moxifloxacin 400 mg and levofloxacin 750 mg among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.比较住院社区获得性肺炎患者静脉滴注莫西沙星 400mg 与左氧氟沙星 750mg 的住院时间、总费用和治疗成功率。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00576.x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
4
The science of selecting antimicrobials for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).社区获得性肺炎(CAP)抗菌药物的选择科学
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Mar;15(2 Suppl):S5-11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.5.
5
A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay.美国住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的比较:以住院时间为重点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):895-906. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273408.
6
Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.加替沙星与头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎的成本效益分析
Chest. 2001 May;119(5):1439-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.5.1439.
7
Treatment costs associated with community-acquired pneumonia by community level of antimicrobial resistance.按社区抗菌药物耐药水平划分的社区获得性肺炎相关治疗费用
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 May;61(5):1162-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn073. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
8
Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis.门诊环境中接受左氧氟沙星或大环内酯类药物治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的治疗失败率、医疗保健利用情况及成本:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.023.
9
A clinical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia: an observational cohort study.社区获得性肺炎的临床路径:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jul 6;11:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-188.
10
An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.与静脉注射/口服阿莫西林克拉维酸联合或不联合克拉霉素相比,序贯静脉注射/口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的经济学评价。
Chest. 2003 Aug;124(2):526-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.2.526.

引用本文的文献

1
Resource use by patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia in Europe: analysis of the REACH study.欧洲社区获得性肺炎住院患者的资源利用:REACH 研究分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Mar 5;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-36.
2
Evaluation of an early step-down strategy from intravenous anidulafungin to oral azole therapy for the treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: results from an open-label trial.一项关于从静脉注射阿尼芬净早期降阶梯至口服唑类药物治疗念珠菌血症及其他侵袭性念珠菌病形式的评估:一项开放标签试验的结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 21;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-97.
3
Economic burden of inpatient and outpatient antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft-tissue infections: a comparison of linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染的住院及门诊抗生素治疗的经济负担:利奈唑胺、万古霉素和达托霉素的比较
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Sep 16;5:447-57. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S46991. eCollection 2013.
4
Costs of bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli and influence of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase production and inadequate initial antibiotic therapy.产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌血流感染的成本及初始经验性抗生素治疗不当的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Oct;54(10):4085-91. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00143-10. Epub 2010 Jul 26.