Lorenzi Nancy M, Kouroubali Angelina, Detmer Don E, Bloomrosen Meryl
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, The Informatics Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Feb 23;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15.
Adoption of EHRs by U.S. ambulatory practices has been slow despite the perceived benefits of their use. Most evaluations of EHR implementations in the literature apply to large practice settings. While there are similarities relating to EHR implementation in large and small practice settings, the authors argue that scale is an important differentiator. Focusing on small ambulatory practices, this paper outlines the benefits and barriers to EHR use in this setting, and provides a "field guide" for these practices to facilitate successful EHR implementation.
The benefits of EHRs in ambulatory practices include improved patient care and office efficiency, and potential financial benefits. Barriers to EHRs include costs; lack of standardization of EHR products and the design of vendor systems for large practice environments; resistance to change; initial difficulty of system use leading to productivity reduction; and perceived accrual of benefits to society and payers rather than providers. The authors stress the need for developing a flexible change management strategy when introducing EHRs that is relevant to the small practice environment; the strategy should acknowledge the importance of relationship management and the role of individual staff members in helping the entire staff to manage change. Practice staff must create an actionable vision outlining realistic goals for the implementation, and all staff must buy into the project. The authors detail the process of implementing EHRs through several stages: decision, selection, pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation. They stress the importance of identifying a champion to serve as an advocate of the value of EHRs and provide direction and encouragement for the project. Other key activities include assessing and redesigning workflow; understanding financial issues; conducting training that is well-timed and meets the needs of practice staff; and evaluating the implementation process.
The EHR implementation experience depends on a variety of factors including the technology, training, leadership, the change management process, and the individual character of each ambulatory practice environment. Sound processes must support both technical and personnel-related organizational components. Additional research is needed to further refine recommendations for the small physician practice and the nuances of specific medical specialties.
尽管美国门诊机构采用电子健康记录(EHR)有诸多益处,但采用速度一直较慢。文献中对EHR实施的多数评估适用于大型医疗机构。虽然大型和小型医疗机构在EHR实施方面存在相似之处,但作者认为规模是一个重要的区别因素。本文聚焦小型门诊机构,概述了在此环境中使用EHR的益处和障碍,并为这些机构提供一份“实地指南”,以促进EHR的成功实施。
门诊机构使用EHR的益处包括改善患者护理和办公效率,以及潜在的经济收益。EHR的障碍包括成本;EHR产品缺乏标准化以及供应商为大型医疗机构环境设计的系统;对变革的抵触;系统使用初期的困难导致生产力下降;以及认为收益归于社会和支付方而非医疗机构。作者强调,在引入与小型医疗机构环境相关的EHR时,需要制定灵活的变革管理策略;该策略应认识到关系管理的重要性以及个体员工在帮助全体员工管理变革方面的作用。医疗机构员工必须制定一个可操作的愿景,概述实施的现实目标,并且所有员工都必须认同该项目。作者详细介绍了通过几个阶段实施EHR的过程:决策、选择、实施前、实施和实施后。他们强调确定一位倡导者的重要性,该倡导者要宣传EHR的价值,并为项目提供指导和鼓励。其他关键活动包括评估和重新设计工作流程;了解财务问题;进行适时且满足医疗机构员工需求的培训;以及评估实施过程。
EHR的实施经验取决于多种因素,包括技术、培训、领导力、变革管理过程以及每个门诊机构环境的个性。完善的流程必须同时支持与技术和人员相关的组织组成部分。需要进一步开展研究,以进一步完善针对小型医生诊所的建议以及特定医学专业的细微差别。