Suppr超能文献

在心脏手术患者中使用一次性输送系统(AnaConDa)时七氟醚的洗入动力学。

Wash-in kinetics for sevoflurane using a disposable delivery system (AnaConDa) in cardiac surgery patients.

作者信息

Sturesson L W, Johansson A, Bodelsson M, Malmkvist G

机构信息

Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Apr;102(4):470-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep019. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of volatile anaesthetics has increased in situations where conventional anaesthetic machines are inadequate or unavailable, for example, cardiac surgery and intensive care. The disposable anaesthetic conserving device, AnaConDa, allows vaporization of liquid volatile anaesthetics from a syringe pump and rebreathing of exhaled anaesthetic. Clinical use requires understanding of device-specific anaesthetic agent kinetics, which are not fully known. We compared the wash-in kinetics for sevoflurane administered by a conventional vaporizer in a non-rebreathing system and the AnaConDa and evaluated if a standard anaesthesia gas monitor gave accurate readings while using the AnaConDa.

METHODS

Cardiac surgery patients were randomized to maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane either via a vaporizer or via the AnaConDa (n=8 in each group). Sevoflurane in arterial blood and airway gas was measured with gas chromatography and standard gas monitoring.

RESULTS

The initial increase in arterial sevoflurane tension was greater with the vaporizer than with the AnaConDa, but the time to reach 80% of maximum sevoflurane tension was close to 8 min in both groups. End-tidal sevoflurane tension mirrored arterial tension in both groups, whereas measured inspired tension was lower than expired and arterial tensions with the use of the AnaConDa.

CONCLUSIONS

The wash-in kinetics for sevoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa are similar to a vaporizer. End-tidal sevoflurane tension accurately reflects arterial tension whereas inspired tension may be underestimated using an AnaConDa.

摘要

背景

在传统麻醉机不足或无法使用的情况下,如心脏手术和重症监护中,挥发性麻醉剂的使用有所增加。一次性麻醉保存装置AnaConDa可使液体挥发性麻醉剂从注射泵中汽化,并对呼出的麻醉剂进行再呼吸。临床使用需要了解特定装置的麻醉剂动力学,但目前尚未完全明确。我们比较了在非再呼吸系统中使用传统蒸发器和AnaConDa给予七氟醚时的吸入动力学,并评估了在使用AnaConDa时标准麻醉气体监测仪的读数是否准确。

方法

心脏手术患者被随机分为两组,分别通过蒸发器或AnaConDa使用七氟醚维持麻醉(每组8例)。采用气相色谱法和标准气体监测测量动脉血和气道气体中的七氟醚。

结果

蒸发器组动脉血中七氟醚张力的初始升高幅度大于AnaConDa组,但两组达到最大七氟醚张力80%的时间均接近8分钟。两组的呼气末七氟醚张力均反映了动脉张力,而在使用AnaConDa时,测得的吸入张力低于呼出和动脉张力。

结论

AnaConDa输送七氟醚的吸入动力学与蒸发器相似。呼气末七氟醚张力能准确反映动脉张力,而使用AnaConDa时吸入张力可能被低估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验