• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症患者中低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗反应者与无反应者之间定量脑电图变量的基线差异

Baseline Difference in Quantitative Electroencephalography Variables Between Responders and Non-Responders to Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression.

作者信息

Vlcek Premysl, Bares Martin, Novak Tomas, Brunovsky Martin

机构信息

National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.

Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 27;11:83. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00083. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00083
PMID:32174854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7057228/
Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for depressive disorder, with outcomes approaching 45-55% response and 30-40% remission. Eligible predictors of treatment outcome, however, are still lacking. Few studies have investigated quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) parameters as predictors of rTMS treatment outcome and none of them have addressed the source localization techniques to predict the response to low-frequency rTMS (LF rTMS). We investigated electrophysiological differences based on scalp EEG data and inverse solution method, exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), between responders and non-responders to LF rTMS in resting brain activity recorded prior to the treatment. Twenty-five unmedicated depressive patients (mean age of 45.7 years, 20 females) received a 4-week treatment of LF rTMS (1 Hz; 20 sessions per 600 pulses; 100% of the motor threshold) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Comparisons between responders (≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score) and non-responders were made at baseline for measures of eLORETA current density, spectral absolute power, and inter-hemispheric and intra-hemispheric EEG asymmetry. Responders were found to have lower current source densities in the alpha-2 and beta-1 frequency bands bilaterally (with predominance on the left side) in the inferior, medial, and middle frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, cingulate gyrus, anterior cingulate, and insula. The most pronounced difference was found in the left middle frontal gyrus for alpha-2 and beta-1 bands (p < 0.05). Using a spectral absolute power analysis, we found a negative correlation between the absolute power in beta and theta frequency bands on the left frontal electrode F7 and the change in depressive symptomatology. None of the selected asymmetries significantly differentiated responders from non-responders in any frequency band. Pre-treatment reduction of alpha-2 and beta-1 sources, but not QEEG asymmetry, was found in patients with major depressive disorder who responded to LF rTMS treatment. Prospective trials with larger groups of subjects are needed to further validate these findings.

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是治疗抑郁症的一种有效方法,有效率达45%-55%,缓解率达30%-40%。然而,目前仍缺乏治疗结果的合格预测指标。很少有研究将定量脑电图(QEEG)参数作为rTMS治疗结果的预测指标,且均未涉及用于预测低频rTMS(LF rTMS)反应的源定位技术。我们基于头皮脑电图数据和精确低分辨率脑电磁断层成像(eLORETA)的逆解方法,研究了治疗前静息脑活动中LF rTMS治疗反应者与无反应者之间的电生理差异。25名未服药的抑郁症患者(平均年龄45.7岁,20名女性)接受了为期4周的右侧背外侧前额叶皮质LF rTMS治疗(1赫兹;每600次脉冲20次治疗;运动阈值的100%)。在基线时,对反应者(蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表评分降低≥50%)和无反应者进行比较,测量eLORETA电流密度、频谱绝对功率以及半球间和半球内脑电图不对称性。结果发现,反应者双侧α-2和β-1频段(左侧更明显)在额下回、额中回、额内侧回、中央前回、扣带回、前扣带回和岛叶的电流源密度较低。α-2和β-1频段在左侧额中回的差异最为显著(p<0.05)。通过频谱绝对功率分析,我们发现左侧额电极F7上β和θ频段的绝对功率与抑郁症状变化呈负相关。在任何频段中,所选的不对称性均未显著区分反应者和无反应者。对LF rTMS治疗有反应的重度抑郁症患者在治疗前出现α-2和β-1源减少,但QEEG不对称性未出现减少。需要进行更大样本量的前瞻性试验来进一步验证这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/e32b87f3d279/fpsyt-11-00083-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/ba4c2762484c/fpsyt-11-00083-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/a304e8917e7e/fpsyt-11-00083-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/3bb1dc187354/fpsyt-11-00083-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/e32b87f3d279/fpsyt-11-00083-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/ba4c2762484c/fpsyt-11-00083-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/a304e8917e7e/fpsyt-11-00083-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/3bb1dc187354/fpsyt-11-00083-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0678/7057228/e32b87f3d279/fpsyt-11-00083-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Baseline Difference in Quantitative Electroencephalography Variables Between Responders and Non-Responders to Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression.抑郁症患者中低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗反应者与无反应者之间定量脑电图变量的基线差异
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 27;11:83. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00083. eCollection 2020.
2
Potentiation of quantitative electroencephalograms following prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression.前额叶重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症患者定量脑电图的增效作用。
Neurosci Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;77(1-2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
Resting electroencephalographic correlates of the clinical response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A preliminary comparison between unipolar and bipolar depression.静息态脑电图与重复经颅磁刺激临床反应的相关性:单相和双相抑郁的初步比较。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 1;183:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.029. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
4
Change in Quantitative EEG Theta Cordance as a Potential Predictor of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Clinical Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder.定量脑电图θ波相干性变化作为重度抑郁症重复经颅磁刺激临床疗效的潜在预测指标
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2018 Sep;49(5):306-315. doi: 10.1177/1550059417746212. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Changes in brain connectivity during a sham-controlled, transcranial magnetic stimulation trial for depression.抑郁症经颅磁刺激假手术对照试验中的脑连接变化。
J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
QEEG Theta Cordance in the Prediction of Treatment Outcome to Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation or Venlafaxine ER in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.脑电图θ波一致性在预测重度抑郁症患者前额叶重复经颅磁刺激或文拉法辛缓释剂治疗效果中的作用
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Apr;46(2):73-80. doi: 10.1177/1550059413520442. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
7
[Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: response factor].[重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:反应因素]
Encephale. 2012 Sep;38(4):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
8
Changes of oscillatory brain activity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy subjects.健康受试者左侧背外侧前额叶皮层重复经颅磁刺激诱导的振荡脑活动变化。
Neuroimage. 2014 Mar;88:91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.029. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
9
Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.间歇性theta波爆发刺激(iTBS)和10赫兹高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性单相抑郁症的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1764-8.
10
Analysis of Brain Functional Changes in High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression.高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的脑功能变化分析
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014 Oct;45(4):257-261. doi: 10.1177/1550059413515656. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased Delta and Theta Power Density in Sickle Cell Disease Individuals with Chronic Pain Secondary to Hip Osteonecrosis: A Resting-State Eeg Study.镰状细胞病伴髋部骨坏死慢性疼痛个体的 Delta 和 Theta 功率密度增加:一项静息态脑电图研究。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Sep;37(5):859-873. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-01027-x. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Functional role of frontal electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry in the resting state in patients with depression: A review.抑郁症患者静息状态下额叶脑电图α波不对称性的功能作用:综述
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Mar 26;11(9):1903-1917. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1903.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of frontal alpha asymmetry in depressed patients during antidepressant treatment.抗抑郁治疗中抑郁患者额区α不对称性的稳定性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102056. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102056. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
Frontal theta and posterior alpha in resting EEG: A critical examination of convergent and discriminant validity.静息态 EEG 中的额部 theta 和后部 alpha:对会聚和判别有效性的批判性考察。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13483. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13483. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
3
Antidepressant and antisuicidal effects of ketamine on the functional connectivity of prefrontal cortex-related circuits in treatment-resistant depression: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, longitudinal resting fMRI study.
氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症的抗抑郁和抗自杀作用:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、纵向静息 fMRI 研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Dec 1;259:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.022. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
4
Prediction of rTMS treatment response in major depressive disorder using machine learning techniques and nonlinear features of EEG signal.使用机器学习技术和 EEG 信号的非线性特征预测重度抑郁症的 rTMS 治疗反应。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.070. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
A Focus on the Functions of Area 25.关注25区的功能。
Brain Sci. 2019 Jun 3;9(6):129. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9060129.
6
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.非手术性脑刺激治疗成人重度抑郁发作急性期的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 27;364:l1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1079.
7
Quantitative Electroencephalography in Guiding Treatment of Major Depression.定量脑电图在重度抑郁症治疗指导中的应用
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 23;9:779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00779. eCollection 2018.
8
EEG Phase Synchronization in Persons With Depression Subjected to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.经颅磁刺激治疗的抑郁症患者的脑电图相位同步化
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 14;12:1037. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01037. eCollection 2018.
9
EEG Frequency Bands in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Resting State Studies.精神疾病中的脑电图频段:静息态研究综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;12:521. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00521. eCollection 2018.
10
Response and Remission Rates Following High-Frequency vs. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Over Right DLPFC for Treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind Trials.高频与低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于右侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)后的反应率与缓解率:一项随机双盲试验的荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 7;9:413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00413. eCollection 2018.