Suppr超能文献

65岁及以上与65岁以下患者的房室结传导异常及房室结折返性心动过速

Abnormal atrioventricular node conduction and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients older versus younger than 65 years of age.

作者信息

Grecu Mihaela, Floria Mariana, Georgescu Catalina Arsenescu

机构信息

Cardiovascular Diseases Institute Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S98-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02261.x.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We examined the possible role of atrioventricular node (AVN) conduction abnormalities as a cause of AVN reentrant tachycardia (RT) in patients >65 years of age.

STUDY POPULATION

Slow pathway radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was performed in 104 patients. Patients in group 1 (n = 14) were >65 years of age and had AV conduction abnormalities associated with structural heart disease. Patients in group 2 (n = 90) were <65 years of age and had lone AVNRT.

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 versus group 2 (66% vs. 46% men) had a first episode of tachycardia at an older age than in group 2 (68 +/- 16.8 vs 32.5 +/- 18.8 years, P = 0.007). The history of arrhythmia was shorter in group 1 (5.4 +/- 3.8 vs 17.5 +/- 14, P = 0.05) and was associated with a higher proportion of patients with underlying heart disease than in group 2 (79% vs 3%, P < 0.001). The electrophysiological measurements were significantly shorter in group 2: atrial-His interval (74 +/- 17 vs 144 +/- 44 ms, P = 0.005), His-ventricular (HV) interval (41 +/- 5 vs 57 +/- 7 ms, P = 0.001), Wenckebach cycle length (329 +/- 38 vs 436 +/- 90 ms, P = 0.001), slow pathway effective refractory period (268 +/- 7 vs 344 +/- 94 ms, P = 0.005), and tachycardia cycle length (332 +/- 53 vs 426 +/- 56 ms, P = 0.001). The ventriculoatrial block cycle length was similar in both groups. The immediate procedural success rate was 100% in both groups, and no complication was observed in either group. One patient in group 2 had recurrence of AVNRT. One patient with a 98-ms HV interval underwent permanent VVI pacemaker implantation before RFCA procedure.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA for AVNRT at >65 years of age had a shorter history of tachycardia-related symptoms than patients with lone AVNRT. The longer AVN conduction intervals and refractory period might explain the late development of AVNRT in group 1.

摘要

研究目的

我们研究了房室结(AVN)传导异常作为65岁以上患者房室结折返性心动过速(RT)病因的可能作用。

研究人群

对104例患者进行了慢径路射频导管消融(RFCA)。第1组(n = 14)患者年龄>65岁,伴有与结构性心脏病相关的房室传导异常。第2组(n = 90)患者年龄<65岁,患有孤立性房室结折返性心动过速。

结果

与第2组相比,第1组患者(男性占66% vs. 46%)首次发生心动过速的年龄更大(68±16.8岁 vs 32.5±18.8岁,P = 0.007)。第1组患者的心律失常病史较短(5.4±3.8年 vs 17.5±14年,P = 0.05),且与潜在心脏病患者的比例高于第2组(79% vs 3%,P < 0.001)。第2组的电生理测量值明显更短:心房-希氏束间期(74±17 vs 144±44毫秒,P = 0.005)、希氏束-心室(HV)间期(41±5 vs 57±7毫秒,P = 0.001)、文氏周期长度(329±38 vs 436±90毫秒,P = 0.001)、慢径路有效不应期(268±7 vs 344±94毫秒,P = 0.005)以及心动过速周期长度(332±53 vs 426±56毫秒,P = 0.001)。两组的室房阻滞周期长度相似。两组的即刻手术成功率均为100%,且两组均未观察到并发症。第2组有1例患者发生房室结折返性心动过速复发。1例HV间期为98毫秒的患者在RFCA手术前接受了永久性VVI起搏器植入。

结论

与孤立性房室结折返性心动过速患者相比,65岁以上接受RFCA治疗房室结折返性心动过速的患者与心动过速相关症状的病史较短。更长的房室结传导间期和不应期可能解释了第1组患者房室结折返性心动过速的晚发情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验