Liuba Ioan, Jönsson Anders, Säfström Kåge, Walfridsson Håkan
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Linköping, Linköping, Sweden.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 1;97(3):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.042. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
The present study sought to assess the extent of gender differences in electrophysiologic parameters in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The study population consisted of 203 patients (women/men ratio 2:1) who underwent slow pathway ablation. Patients with associated heart disease experienced the first episode of tachycardia at a significantly older age than patients with lone AVNRT (women 50 +/- 18 vs 29 +/- 15 years, p < 0.0001; men 45 +/- 20 vs 31 +/- 17 years, p = 0.01). Sinus cycle length (797 +/- 142 vs 870 +/- 161 ms, p = 0.0001), HV interval (41 +/- 7 vs 45 +/- 8 ms, p = 0.0001), atrioventricular (AV) block cycle length (348 +/- 53 vs 371 +/- 75 ms, p = 0.01), slow pathway effective refractory period (ERP) (258 +/- 46 vs 287 +/- 62 ms, p = 0.006), and tachycardia cycle length (354 +/- 58 vs 383 +/- 60 ms, p = 0.001) were shorter in women. No gender differences were noted in fast pathway ERP and ventriculoatrial (VA) block cycle length. In women, an AV block cycle length <350 ms along with a VA block cycle length <400 ms predicted tachycardia induction without the need for autonomic intervention, with a positive predictive value of 93% (sensitivity 71%, specificity 82%). No such cut-off values could be found in men. The acute success rate (100% vs 98%) and the recurrence rate (3% vs 6%) were similar for the 2 genders. In conclusion, in patients with lone AVNRT, the onset of symptoms occurred at a younger age than in patients with concomitant heart disease. Women had shorter slow pathway refractory periods, AV block cycle lengths, and tachycardia cycle lengths. No gender differences were noted in the fast pathway ERP. Therefore, women have a wider "tachycardia window" (i.e., the difference between the fast and slow pathway refractory periods), a finding that may explain their greater incidence of AVNRT.
本研究旨在评估房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者电生理参数的性别差异程度。研究人群包括203例行慢径消融的患者(女性/男性比例为2:1)。合并心脏病的患者首次发生心动过速的年龄显著高于孤立性AVNRT患者(女性为50±18岁对29±15岁,p<0.0001;男性为45±20岁对31±17岁,p=0.01)。女性的窦性周期长度(797±142对870±161毫秒,p=0.0001)、HV间期(41±7对45±8毫秒,p=0.0001)、房室(AV)阻滞周期长度(348±53对371±75毫秒,p=0.01)、慢径有效不应期(ERP)(258±46对287±62毫秒,p=0.006)和心动过速周期长度(354±58对383±60毫秒,p=0.001)较短。快径ERP和室房(VA)阻滞周期长度未发现性别差异。在女性中,AV阻滞周期长度<350毫秒且VA阻滞周期长度<400毫秒可预测无需自主神经干预即可诱发心动过速,阳性预测值为93%(敏感性71%,特异性82%)。在男性中未发现此类临界值。两种性别的急性成功率(100%对98%)和复发率(3%对6%)相似。总之,在孤立性AVNRT患者中,症状出现的年龄比合并心脏病的患者年轻。女性的慢径不应期、AV阻滞周期长度和心动过速周期长度较短。快径ERP未发现性别差异。因此,女性有更宽的“心动过速窗口”(即快径和慢径不应期之间的差异),这一发现可能解释了她们AVNRT发病率较高的原因。