• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚一家医院用药错误的观察性研究(用药错误研究)

An observational study of drug administration errors in a Malaysian hospital (study of drug administration errors).

作者信息

Chua S S, Tea M H, Rahman M H A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Apr;34(2):215-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00997.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00997.x
PMID:19250142
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug administration errors were the second most frequent type of medication errors, after prescribing errors but the latter were often intercepted hence, administration errors were more probably to reach the patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the frequency and types of drug administration errors in a Malaysian hospital ward.

METHODS

This is a prospective study that involved direct, undisguised observations of drug administrations in a hospital ward. A researcher was stationed in the ward under study for 15 days to observe all drug administrations which were recorded in a data collection form and then compared with the drugs prescribed for the patient.

RESULTS

A total of 1118 opportunities for errors were observed and 127 administrations had errors. This gave an error rate of 11.4 % [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5-13.3]. If incorrect time errors were excluded, the error rate reduced to 8.7% (95% CI 7.1-10.4). The most common types of drug administration errors were incorrect time (25.2%), followed by incorrect technique of administration (16.3%) and unauthorized drug errors (14.1%). In terms of clinical significance, 10.4% of the administration errors were considered as potentially life-threatening. Intravenous routes were more likely to be associated with an administration error than oral routes (21.3% vs. 7.9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that the frequency of drug administration errors in developing countries such as Malaysia is similar to that in the developed countries. Incorrect time errors were also the most common type of drug administration errors. A non-punitive system of reporting medication errors should be established to encourage more information to be documented so that risk management protocol could be developed and implemented.

摘要

背景与目的

给药错误是仅次于处方错误的第二常见用药错误类型,但后者往往能被拦截,因此给药错误更有可能影响到患者。因此,本研究旨在确定马来西亚一家医院病房给药错误的发生率及类型。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,对医院病房的给药情况进行直接、无掩饰的观察。一名研究人员在研究病房驻点15天,观察所有给药情况,并记录在数据收集表中,然后与为患者开具的药物进行比较。

结果

共观察到1118次可能出现错误的给药机会,其中127次给药存在错误。错误率为11.4%[95%置信区间(CI)9.5 - 13.3]。若排除给药时间错误,错误率降至8.7%(95%CI 7.1 - 10.4)。最常见的给药错误类型是给药时间错误(25.2%),其次是给药技术错误(16.3%)和未经授权用药错误(14.1%)。就临床意义而言,10.4%的给药错误被认为可能危及生命。静脉给药途径比口服给药途径更易出现给药错误(21.3%对7.9%,P < 0.001)。

结论

该研究表明,在马来西亚等发展中国家,给药错误的发生率与发达国家相似。给药时间错误也是最常见的给药错误类型。应建立一个非惩罚性的用药错误报告系统,以鼓励记录更多信息,从而制定和实施风险管理方案。

相似文献

1
An observational study of drug administration errors in a Malaysian hospital (study of drug administration errors).马来西亚一家医院用药错误的观察性研究(用药错误研究)
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Apr;34(2):215-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00997.x.
2
The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients.儿科住院患者处方和药物管理错误的发生率和性质。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Feb;95(2):113-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.158485. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
3
Errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: an observational study.教学医院重症监护病房静脉用药配制与给药的差错:一项观察性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2008 May;21(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
4
Drug administration errors in an institution for individuals with intellectual disability: an observational study.一家智障人士机构中的用药错误:一项观察性研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007 Jul;51(Pt 7):528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00919.x.
5
[Drug dispensing errors].[药品调配差错]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Nov 27;168(48):4185-8.
6
[Error detection in the administration of antiretroviral therapy to out-patients].[门诊抗逆转录病毒治疗管理中的错误检测]
Farm Hosp. 2004 May-Jun;28(3):201-4.
7
[Detection and classification of medication errors at Joan XXIII University Hospital].[琼·XXIII大学医院用药错误的检测与分类]
Farm Hosp. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2):90-6.
8
Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards.澳大利亚外科护理病房静脉输液给药错误的预测因素。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):179-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010728.
9
Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology.静脉用药错误尖锐问题的见解:对输液泵技术的启示。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):80-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011957.
10
Frequency and severity of harm of medication errors related to the parenteral nutrition process in a large university teaching hospital.一所大型大学教学医院中与肠外营养过程相关的用药错误的危害频率和严重程度。
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Aug;29(8):966-74. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.8.966.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a Simulation-Based Teaching Module on Intravenous Drug Administration Among Phase II MBBS Students in Pharmacology: A Competency-Based Medical Education Initiative.基于模拟的教学模块对药理学专业大二医学学士学生静脉给药的影响:一项基于能力的医学教育倡议
Cureus. 2025 May 23;17(5):e84667. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84667. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Intravenous Medication Administration Errors in Hospitalised Patients: An Updated Systematic Review.住院患者静脉用药给药错误:一项最新的系统评价
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70167. doi: 10.1111/jep.70167.
3
How to get over with medication errors underestimation? Improving indices of medication errors with focus on intravenous medications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting; a direct observation study.
如何克服对用药错误低估的问题?在造血干细胞移植环境下,通过关注静脉药物来提高用药错误指标:一项直接观察研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0307753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307753. eCollection 2024.
4
Your clinical pharmacist can save your life, the impact of pharmacist's intervention.您的临床药剂师可以挽救您的生命,药剂师干预的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):2729. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2729. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Observational study on medication administration errors at a University Hospital in Brazil: incidence, nature and associated factors.巴西一家大学医院用药错误的观察性研究:发生率、性质及相关因素。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Aug 22;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00443-x.
6
Detection of medication administration errors at a tertiary hospital using a direct observation approach.采用直接观察法在一家三级医院检测用药错误
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 Nov 24;17(3):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.08.015. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Medication Errors and Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Qualitative Exploration of Physicians' Perceptions, Experiences and Expectations From Quetta City, Pakistan.用药错误与2型糖尿病管理:对巴基斯坦奎达市医生认知、经验及期望的质性探索
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 28;9:846530. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.846530. eCollection 2022.
8
Implementation of Objective Structured Practical Examination in Formative Assessment for Undergraduate Practical Pharmacology.客观结构化实践考试在本科药理学实践形成性评估中的实施
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Mar;16(1):64-74. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.16.1.64.
9
Prevalence and characteristics of medication errors at an emergency department of a teaching hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家教学医院急诊科药物错误的发生率和特征。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4921-4.
10
Pharmacist-assisted electronic prescribing at the time of admission to an inpatient orthopaedic unit and its impact on medication errors: a pre- and postintervention study.骨科住院单元入院时药剂师辅助电子处方开具及其对用药错误的影响:一项干预前后研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jul 12;10:2042098619863985. doi: 10.1177/2042098619863985. eCollection 2019.