Jefferies S, Taylor A, Reznek R
Department of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Apr;21(3):204-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
Technical developments in radiotherapy have increased very rapidly over recent years, resulting in the processes of radiotherapy planning and delivery changing significantly. It is essential that alongside these developments, optimal methods for accurate target volume definition become a priority. The Radiotherapy Imaging for Delivery of Radiotherapy Working Party was formed to create a framework for imaging for radiotherapy planning and delivery: the areas of interest were interpretation of imaging for planning, optimum acquisition of imaging for radiotherapy planning and training and assessment across all staff groups involved with radiotherapy planning. A detailed assessment of the current situation in the UK was needed to prepare for this document. A national survey was undertaken and the results are reported in this paper.
A questionnaire was sent to all NHS radiotherapy departments in the UK on 3 occasions in 2007. A total of 48 replies were received from 58 centres giving a response rate of 83%.
Approximately half of centres (46%) in the UK use IMRT. Thirteen centres are using IMRT in the routine management of patients. Nine centres indicated that they use IMRT routinely within the research setting. Twenty-six centres are not using IMRT but 10 centres are planning to implement the technology within 12 months. Only 4 centres in the UK routinely use IGRT and 6 centres report use of image guidance in the research setting. Twelve centres are planning to implement this over 12 months. Few oncologists have dedicated radiology input for planning. Twenty-seven centres had help from radiologists on an ad hoc basis only and 10 centres had no input at all. Only 2 centres have formal radiology training for trainees and 9 centres report ad hoc time with diagnostic radiologists or cite the FRCR course as the main sources of training. Twelve centres have structured training for radiographers and 4 centres for medical physicists.
This survey assessed radiotherapy planning and delivery within the UK in 2007. The most significant findings were the lack of implementation of IMRT and IGRT which appeared to mainly to be due to lack of available staff, such as medical physicists, insufficient access to existing equipment, lack of time for more complex radiotherapy planning and insufficient funding. A further concern is the lack of formal training in tumour and normal tissue outlining across several staff groups.
近年来放疗技术发展迅速,导致放疗计划制定和实施过程发生了显著变化。在这些发展的同时,准确确定靶区体积的最佳方法成为当务之急。成立了放疗影像用于放疗实施工作组,以创建一个放疗计划制定和实施的影像框架:关注的领域包括计划影像解读、放疗计划制定的最佳影像采集以及涉及放疗计划制定的所有人员组别的培训与评估。为编写本文件,需要对英国的现状进行详细评估。开展了一项全国性调查,结果在本文中报告。
2007年分三次向英国所有国民保健服务(NHS)放疗科室发送了调查问卷。共收到来自58个中心的48份回复,回复率为83%。
英国约一半的中心(46%)使用调强放疗(IMRT)。13个中心在患者的常规管理中使用IMRT。9个中心表示他们在研究环境中常规使用IMRT。26个中心不使用IMRT,但10个中心计划在12个月内实施该技术。英国只有4个中心常规使用影像引导放疗(IGRT),6个中心报告在研究环境中使用影像引导。12个中心计划在12个月内实施此技术。很少有肿瘤学家在计划制定时有专门的放射科投入。27个中心仅在临时情况下得到放射科医生的帮助,10个中心根本没有得到投入。只有2个中心为实习生提供正式的放射科培训,9个中心报告与诊断放射科医生有临时交流时间或提及皇家放射科医师学会(FRCR)课程是主要培训来源。12个中心为放射技师提供结构化培训,4个中心为医学物理师提供结构化培训。
本次调查评估了2007年英国的放疗计划制定和实施情况。最显著的发现是调强放疗和影像引导放疗的实施不足,这似乎主要是由于缺乏可用人员,如医学物理师,现有设备使用不足,进行更复杂放疗计划的时间不够以及资金不足。另一个令人担忧的问题是多个人员组在肿瘤和正常组织勾勒方面缺乏正式培训。