Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
Br J Radiol. 2021 Jun 1;94(1122):20210001. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210001. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to determine the barriers faced. The goal was to inform whether additional guidance and QA tools were needed.
A survey focussed on clinical use, metrics used, how centres would like to use DIR in the future and challenges faced, was designed and sent to 71 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Data were gathered specifically on which centres we using DIR clinically, which applications were being used, what commissioning and QA tests were performed, and what barriers were preventing the integration of DIR into the clinical workflow. Centres that did not use DIR clinically were encouraged to fill in the survey and were asked if they have any future plans and in what timescale.
51 out of 71 (70%) radiotherapy centres responded. 47 centres reported access to a commercial software that could perform DIR. 20 centres already used DIR clinically, and 22 centres had plans to implement an application of DIR within 3 years of the survey. The most common clinical application of DIR was to propagate contours from one scan to another (19 centres). In each of the applications, the types of commissioning and QA tests performed varied depending on the type of application and between centres. Some of the key barriers were determining when a DIR was satisfactory including which metrics to use, and lack of resources.
The survey results highlighted that there is a need for additional guidelines, training, better tools for commissioning DIR software and for the QA of registration results, which should include developing or recommending which quantitative metrics to use.
This survey has given a useful picture of the clinical use and lack of use of DIR in UK radiotherapy centres. The survey provided useful insight into how centres commission and QA DIR applications, especially the variability among centres. It was also possible to highlight key barriers to implementation and determine factors that may help overcome this which include the need for additional guidance specific to different applications, better tools and metrics.
本研究旨在评估当前放射治疗中变形图像配准(DIR)的临床应用现状,并了解中心在临床实施 DIR 中面临的挑战,包括配置和质量保证(QA),并确定所面临的障碍。目的是确定是否需要额外的指导和 QA 工具。
我们设计并向英国 71 个放疗中心发送了一份侧重于临床应用、使用的指标、中心未来希望如何使用 DIR 以及面临的挑战的调查。我们专门收集了哪些中心正在临床使用 DIR、正在使用哪些应用程序、执行了哪些配置和 QA 测试以及哪些障碍阻止了 DIR 集成到临床工作流程中。未在临床使用 DIR 的中心被鼓励填写调查,并询问他们是否有任何未来计划以及在什么时间范围内。
71 个放疗中心中有 51 个(70%)做出了回应。47 个中心报告可以使用能够执行 DIR 的商业软件。20 个中心已经在临床使用 DIR,22 个中心计划在调查后的 3 年内实施 DIR 应用。DIR 的最常见临床应用是将轮廓从一次扫描传播到另一次扫描(19 个中心)。在每种应用中,执行的配置和 QA 测试的类型因应用类型和中心而异。一些关键障碍包括确定 DIR 何时令人满意,包括使用哪些指标以及资源不足。
调查结果表明,需要额外的指南、培训、用于配置 DIR 软件和注册结果 QA 的更好工具,其中应包括开发或推荐使用哪些定量指标。
本调查很好地描述了英国放射治疗中心 DIR 的临床应用和未应用情况。调查深入了解了中心如何配置和 QA DIR 应用程序,特别是中心之间的差异。还可以突出实施的关键障碍,并确定可能有助于克服这些障碍的因素,包括对不同应用程序的特定额外指导、更好的工具和指标的需求。