Siddiqui Ali A, Yang Kenneth, Spechler Stuart J, Cryer Byron, Davila Raquel, Cipher Daisha, Harford William V
Department of Internal Medicine, Dallas Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75216, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.
Recent studies suggest that colonoscopies done in the morning have better-quality bowel preparations than those done in the afternoon.
We aimed to determine how the duration of the interval between the end of the preparation and the start of the colonoscopy affects preparation quality.
We prospectively studied consecutive outpatients who had colonoscopies performed at our hospital within a 3-month period. The time of day when the colonoscopy started and the time interval from the last dose of preparation agent to the start of the colonoscopy were recorded. The endoscopist graded the quality of the preparation in the right side of the colon by using a 5-point visual scale.
We studied 378 patients (96% men, mean age 62.2 years) who received preparations of polyethylene glycol electrolyte-based (PEG) and sodium phosphate (SP) solution (71%), oral PEG and magnesium citrate (23%), or SP alone (6%).
Compared with patients whose preparations were graded as 2/3/4 (fair/poor/inadequate), those whose preparations were graded as 0/1 (excellent/good) had a significantly shorter interval between the time of the last preparation agent dose and the start of the colonoscopy (P = .013).
We used a nonvalidated scale to assess the quality of bowel preparation.
Bowel-preparation quality varies inversely with the duration of the interval between the last dose of the bowel-preparation agent and the start of colonoscopy. This interval appears to be a better predictor of bowel-preparation quality than the time of day when colonoscopy is performed.
近期研究表明,上午进行的结肠镜检查比下午进行的结肠镜检查肠道准备质量更好。
我们旨在确定准备结束至结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔时间如何影响准备质量。
我们对在3个月内在我院接受结肠镜检查的连续门诊患者进行了前瞻性研究。记录结肠镜检查开始的时间以及从最后一剂准备剂到结肠镜检查开始的时间间隔。内镜医师使用5分视觉量表对结肠右侧的准备质量进行分级。
我们研究了378例患者(96%为男性,平均年龄62.2岁),他们接受了基于聚乙二醇电解质(PEG)和磷酸钠(SP)溶液(71%)、口服PEG和柠檬酸镁(23%)或仅SP(6%)的准备。
与准备质量分级为2/3/4(一般/差/不足)的患者相比,准备质量分级为0/1(优秀/良好)的患者在最后一剂准备剂给药时间与结肠镜检查开始时间之间的间隔明显更短(P = 0.013)。
我们使用了一个未经验证的量表来评估肠道准备质量。
肠道准备质量与最后一剂肠道准备剂给药时间至结肠镜检查开始时间之间的间隔时长呈负相关。该间隔似乎比结肠镜检查进行的时间更能预测肠道准备质量。