Carroll Linda J, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, van der Velde Gabrielle, Haldeman Scott, Holm Lena W, Carragee Eugene J, Hurwitz Eric L, Côté Pierre, Nordin Margareta, Peloso Paul M, Guzman Jaime, Cassidy J David
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.013.
Best evidence synthesis.
To undertake a best evidence synthesis on course and prognosis of neck pain and its associated disorders in the general population.
Knowing the course of neck pain guides expectations for recovery. Identifying prognostic factors assists in planning public policies, formulating interventions, and promoting lifestyle changes to decrease the burden of neck pain.
The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) conducted a critical review of literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain. Findings from studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were abstracted into evidence tables and included in a best evidence synthesis.
We found 226 articles on the course and prognostic factors in neck pain and its associated disorders. After critical review, 70 (31%) of these were accepted on scientific merit. Six studies related to course and 7 to prognostic factors in the general population. Between half and three quarters of persons in these populations with current neck pain will report neck pain again 1 to 5 years later. Younger age predicted better outcome. General exercise was unassociated with outcome, although regular bicycling predicted poor outcome in 1 study. Psychosocial factors, including psychologic health, coping patterns, and need to socialize, were the strongest prognostic factors. Several potential prognostic factors have not been well studied, including degenerative changes, genetic factors, and compensation policies.
The Neck Pain Task Force undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the course and prognosis for this symptom. General exercise was not prognostic of better outcome; however, several psychosocial factors were prognostic of outcome.
最佳证据综合分析。
对普通人群中颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的病程和预后进行最佳证据综合分析。
了解颈部疼痛的病程有助于对康复情况形成预期。识别预后因素有助于制定公共政策、制定干预措施以及促进生活方式改变,以减轻颈部疼痛的负担。
2000 - 2010年骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组(颈部疼痛特别工作组)对1980年至2006年间发表的文献进行了批判性综述,以收集有关颈部疼痛的最佳证据。符合科学有效性标准的研究结果被提炼成证据表,并纳入最佳证据综合分析。
我们找到了226篇关于颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的病程和预后因素的文章。经过批判性综述,其中70篇(31%)基于科学价值被接受。有6项研究涉及普通人群的病程,7项涉及预后因素。这些人群中目前患有颈部疼痛的人,有一半到四分之三会在1至5年后再次报告颈部疼痛。年龄较小预示着预后较好。一般锻炼与预后无关,不过在1项研究中,经常骑自行车预示着预后较差。心理社会因素,包括心理健康、应对方式和社交需求,是最强的预后因素。几个潜在的预后因素尚未得到充分研究,包括退行性改变、遗传因素和补偿政策。
颈部疼痛特别工作组进行了最佳证据综合分析,以建立关于该症状病程和预后的当前最佳证据基线。一般锻炼对预后改善并无预示作用;然而,几个心理社会因素对预后有预示作用。