Carroll Linda J, Holm Lena W, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, Côtè Pierre, Cassidy J David, Haldeman Scott, Nordin Margareta, Hurwitz Eric L, Carragee Eugene J, van der Velde Gabrielle, Peloso Paul M, Guzman Jaime
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S97-S107. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.014.
Best evidence synthesis.
To perform a best evidence synthesis on the course and prognostic factors for neck pain and its associated disorders in Grades I-III whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).
Knowledge of the course of recovery of WAD guides expectations for recovery. Identifying prognostic factors assists in planning management and intervention strategies and effective compensation policies to decrease the burden of WAD.
The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) conducted a critical review of the literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain and its associated disorders. Studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were included in a best evidence synthesis.
We found 226 articles related to course and prognostic factors in neck pain and its associated disorders. After a critical review, 70 (31%) were accepted on scientific merit; 47 of these studies related to course and prognostic factors in WAD. The evidence suggests that approximately 50% of those with WAD will report neck pain symptoms 1 year after their injuries. Greater initial pain, more symptoms, and greater initial disability predicted slower recovery. Few factors related to the collision itself (for example, direction of the collision, headrest type) were prognostic; however, postinjury psychological factors such as passive coping style, depressed mood, and fear of movement were prognostic for slower or less complete recovery. There is also preliminary evidence that the prevailing compensation system is prognostic for recovery in WAD.
The Neck Pain Task Force undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the course and prognosis for WAD. Recovery of WAD seems to be multifactorial.
最佳证据综合分析。
对I - III级挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)中颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的病程和预后因素进行最佳证据综合分析。
了解WAD的恢复过程有助于对恢复情况形成预期。识别预后因素有助于规划管理和干预策略以及制定有效的赔偿政策,以减轻WAD的负担。
2000 - 2010年骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组(颈部疼痛特别工作组)对1980年至2006年间发表的文献进行了严格审查,以收集关于颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的最佳证据。符合科学有效性标准的研究被纳入最佳证据综合分析。
我们发现226篇与颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的病程和预后因素相关的文章。经过严格审查,70篇(31%)基于科学价值被接受;其中47项研究与WAD的病程和预后因素有关。证据表明,约50%的WAD患者在受伤1年后会报告颈部疼痛症状。初始疼痛更剧烈、症状更多以及初始残疾程度更高预示着恢复较慢。与碰撞本身相关的因素(如碰撞方向、头枕类型)很少具有预后意义;然而,受伤后的心理因素,如消极应对方式、情绪低落和运动恐惧,预示着恢复较慢或不完全。也有初步证据表明,现行的赔偿制度对WAD的恢复具有预后意义。
颈部疼痛特别工作组进行了最佳证据综合分析,以建立关于WAD病程和预后的当前最佳证据基线。WAD的恢复似乎是多因素的。