• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国政府禁烟政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的影响。

The impact of governmental antismoking policy on socioeconomic disparities in cigarette smoking in South Korea.

作者信息

Khang Young-Ho, Yun Sung-Cheol, Cho Hong-Jun, Jung-Choi Kyunghee

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2Dong Songpa-Gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):262-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn036. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntn036
PMID:19251768
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With enactment of the 1995 Health Promotion Act, the Korean government has developed numerous antismoking policies, including smoke-free buildings and zones, a public media campaign, and tobacco taxation. The present study examined whether governmental antismoking policy during the past decade was associated with reduced socioeconomic differentials in cigarette smoking in South Korea.

METHODS

Data from 99,980 men and 105,193 women aged 25-64 years were analyzed from four rounds of Social Statistical Surveys of Korea between 1995 and 2006. Socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators were education, occupational class, employment status, and household income. Age-adjusted prevalence of smoking was calculated. Prevalence ratios and the relative index of inequality (RII) were estimated using log-binomial regression analysis.

RESULTS

Absolute socioeconomic differentials in age-adjusted prevalence of smoking increased between 1995 and 2006. Increases were found in both men and women. Prevalence ratios and RIIs also showed widening relative inequalities in smoking in all four SEP indicators in men. For women, increases in RIIs for education and income were statistically significant. The magnitude of change in prevalence ratios and RIIs by SEP indicators between 1999 and 2003 was statistically significant, whereas the difference between 2003 and 2006 was not.

DISCUSSION

Despite reducing overall cigarette smoking rates in males, the governmental antismoking policies of South Korea did not reduce socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in both genders. However, the recent tobacco taxation policy is likely to dampen the ever-increasing trends in smoking inequalities. More progressive antismoking policies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in smoking are warranted in South Korea.

摘要

引言

随着1995年《健康促进法》的颁布,韩国政府制定了众多反吸烟政策,包括无烟建筑和区域、公共媒体宣传活动以及烟草税。本研究调查了过去十年间韩国政府的反吸烟政策是否与吸烟方面社会经济差异的缩小相关。

方法

分析了1995年至2006年间韩国四轮社会统计调查中99980名25至64岁男性和105193名女性的数据。社会经济地位(SEP)指标包括教育程度、职业阶层、就业状况和家庭收入。计算了年龄调整后的吸烟率。使用对数二项回归分析估计患病率比和不平等相对指数(RII)。

结果

1995年至2006年间,年龄调整后的吸烟患病率的绝对社会经济差异有所增加。男性和女性均出现了这种增长。患病率比和RIIs还显示,男性在所有四个SEP指标中的吸烟相对不平等也在扩大。对于女性,教育程度和收入的RIIs增加具有统计学意义。1999年至2003年间,SEP指标的患病率比和RIIs变化幅度具有统计学意义,而2003年至2006年之间的差异则不具有统计学意义。

讨论

尽管韩国政府的反吸烟政策降低了男性总体吸烟率,但并未减少男女在吸烟方面的社会经济不平等。然而,最近的烟草税政策可能会抑制吸烟不平等不断增加的趋势。韩国有必要采取更具进步性的反吸烟政策,以减少吸烟方面的社会经济不平等。

相似文献

1
The impact of governmental antismoking policy on socioeconomic disparities in cigarette smoking in South Korea.韩国政府禁烟政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):262-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn036. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
2
Socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking: trends by gender, age, and socioeconomic position in South Korea, 1989-2003.韩国吸烟方面的社会经济不平等:1989 - 2003年按性别、年龄和社会经济地位划分的趋势
Prev Med. 2006 Jun;42(6):415-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
3
[A multilevel study on the relationship between the residential distribution of high class (power elites) and smoking in Seoul].[首尔高阶层(权力精英)居住分布与吸烟关系的多层次研究]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Jan;39(1):30-8.
4
The contribution of material, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in explaining educational and occupational mortality inequalities in a nationally representative sample of South Koreans: relative and absolute perspectives.在韩国具有全国代表性的样本中,物质、心理社会和行为因素在解释教育和职业死亡率不平等方面的作用:相对和绝对视角
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):858-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 2.
5
[Socioeconomic mortality inequality in Korea: mortality follow-up of the 1998 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data].[韩国社会经济层面的死亡率不平等:基于1998年国民健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据的死亡率随访]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Mar;39(2):115-22.
6
Impact of the 1976 Tobacco Control Act in Finland on the proportion of ever daily smokers by socioeconomic status.1976年芬兰烟草控制法案对按社会经济地位划分的每日吸烟者比例的影响。
Prev Med. 2008 Apr;46(4):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
7
[Changes in mortality inequality in relation to the South Korean economic crisis: use of area-based socioeconomic position].[韩国经济危机相关的死亡率不平等变化:基于地区的社会经济地位的应用]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Aug;38(3):359-65.
8
Long-term trends in smoking prevalence and its socioeconomic inequalities in Korea, 1992-2016.韩国 1992-2016 年吸烟率及其社会经济不平等的长期趋势。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Sep 18;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1051-x.
9
Trends in socio-economic differentials in cigarette smoking behaviour between 1990 and 1998: a large prospective study in Korean men.1990年至1998年间韩国男性吸烟行为的社会经济差异趋势:一项大型前瞻性研究
Public Health. 2004 Dec;118(8):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.04.006.
10
[Socioeconomic differentials in health and health related behaviors: findings from the Korea Youth Panel Survey].[健康及与健康相关行为中的社会经济差异:韩国青年面板调查结果]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Nov;38(4):391-400.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparity between Subjective Health Perception and Lifestyle Practices among Korean Adolescents: A National Representative Sample.韩国青少年主观健康认知与生活方式实践之间的差异:一项全国代表性样本研究
J Lifestyle Med. 2022 Sep 30;12(3):153-163. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2022.12.3.153.
2
Smoking, urinary cotinine levels and incidence of visual impairment.吸烟、尿可替宁水平与视力损害发生率。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79865-z.
3
Socioeconomic Inequalities in e-Cigarette Use in Korea: Comparison with Inequalities in Conventional Cigarette Use Using Two National Surveys.
韩国电子烟使用的社会经济不平等:与两项全国性调查中传统香烟使用不平等的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224458.
4
Long-term trends in smoking prevalence and its socioeconomic inequalities in Korea, 1992-2016.韩国 1992-2016 年吸烟率及其社会经济不平等的长期趋势。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Sep 18;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1051-x.
5
Presenting Differences in Smoking Rates among Working Groups for Smoking Cessation Policies.戒烟政策工作小组之间吸烟率的呈现差异。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Aug 12;34(31):e216. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e216.
6
Trends in inequality in life expectancy at birth between 2004 and 2017 and projections for 2030 in Korea: multiyear cross-sectional differences by income from national health insurance data.2004 年至 2017 年期间韩国出生时预期寿命不平等趋势及 2030 年预测:基于国民健康保险数据的多年截面差异按收入划分。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 3;9(7):e030683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030683.
7
Trends in Inequality in Cigarette Smoking Prevalence by Income According to Recent Anti-smoking Policies in Korea: Use of Three National Surveys.根据韩国近期的反吸烟政策,按收入划分的吸烟流行率不平等趋势:三项全国性调查的应用
J Prev Med Public Health. 2018 Nov;51(6):310-319. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.18.225. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
Comparison of District-level Smoking Prevalence and Their Income Gaps from Two National Databases: the National Health Screening Database and the Community Health Survey in Korea, 2009-2014.比较两个国家级数据库(2009-2014 年韩国国家健康筛查数据库和社区健康调查)中地区吸烟率及其收入差距。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Feb 5;33(6):e44. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e44.
9
Prevalence of Overweight and Income Gaps in 245 Districts of Korea: Comparison Using the National Health Screening Database and the Community Health Survey, 2009-2014.韩国 245 个地区超重的流行率和收入差距:利用国家健康筛查数据库和社区健康调查进行的比较,2009-2014 年。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):e3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e3.
10
Effectiveness of government anti-smoking policy on non-smoking youth in Korea: a 4-year trend analysis of national survey data.韩国政府禁烟政策对非吸烟青少年的成效:基于全国调查数据的四年趋势分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e013984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013984.