University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, UCP, CC72, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1102-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100538.
The authors investigated levels of social inclusion among service users of two types of psychiatric community housing programs in the Netherlands.
A large-scale cross-sectional survey was conducted that included service users of community housing programs (N=255) and their key workers (N=75). Data on social inclusion-participating in activities, receiving and making visits, and vocational participation-were collected through a service user diary. Univariate regression analyses were performed with the social inclusion variables as the dependent variables and type of housing program (supported independent living versus residential care) as the independent variable.
Service users living independently were more likely to feel socially included, in terms of activities and visits, than residents. Type of housing program was not associated with vocational participation.
Although service users living independently were more likely than residents to be socially included, their vocational participation was similar to that of residents. It seems that for both groups of service user, it is important to improve the availability of vocational interventions or programs.
作者研究了荷兰两种类型的精神科社区住房项目的服务使用者的社会包容水平。
进行了一项大规模的横断面调查，其中包括社区住房项目的服务使用者（N=255）及其主要工作人员（N=75）。通过服务使用者日记收集了社会包容方面的参与活动、接待和探访以及职业参与的数据。使用单变量回归分析，将社会包容变量作为因变量，住房计划类型（支持独立生活与住宿护理）作为自变量。
在活动和探访方面，独立生活的服务使用者比居民更有可能感到社会包容。住房计划类型与职业参与无关。
尽管独立生活的服务使用者比居民更有可能被社会包容，但他们的职业参与与居民相似。对于这两组服务使用者来说，似乎都需要改善职业干预或计划的可获得性。
