Suppr超能文献

用于预测前哨淋巴结活检阳性的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移风险的列线图验证:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)乳腺癌列线图的验证

Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy: validation of the MSKCC breast nomogram.

作者信息

van la Parra R F D, Ernst M F, Bevilacqua J L B, Mol S J J, Van Zee K J, Broekman J M, Bosscha K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5200 ME, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0359-y. Epub 2009 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for patients with disease-positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). However, approximately two-thirds will have no additional disease-positive nodes. To identify the patient's individual risk for non-SLN metastases, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) developed a nomogram.

METHODS

The records of 182 breast cancer patients who underwent SLN and ALND were selected. Serial hematoxylin and eosin (HE) analysis and immunohistochemistry were routinely performed on each sentinel node. For application of the nomogram, the detection method was assigned in two ways: for all metastases visible by serial HE, the method of detection was scored as "serial HE" (method 1), independent of the tumor size, and by a combination of size and staining method (method 2); so macrometastasis were scored as detected by routine HE, micrometastasis by serial HE, and isolated tumor cells by immunohistochemistry. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated to assess the discriminative power of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC was .71 (range, .64-.79) according to method 1 and .75 (range, .67-.88) according to method 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the variable "method of detection" in the MSKCC nomogram is a surrogate for SLN metastasis size, the size category of the SLN metastasis can be used in applying the nomogram to patients in whom the SLN histologic analysis is performed by a much different procedure than that used to develop the MSKCC nomogram. This results in an improved predictive accuracy.

摘要

背景

对于前哨淋巴结(SLN)有转移的患者,完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)仍是标准治疗方案。然而,约三分之二的患者不会有其他转移淋巴结。为确定患者非前哨淋巴结转移的个体风险,纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)制定了一种列线图。

方法

选取182例行SLN和ALND的乳腺癌患者的记录。对每个前哨淋巴结常规进行苏木精和伊红(HE)系列分析及免疫组化。对于列线图的应用,检测方法以两种方式赋值:对于所有经系列HE可见的转移灶,检测方法记为“系列HE”(方法1),与肿瘤大小无关,以及通过大小和染色方法的组合(方法2);因此,大转移灶记为通过常规HE检测到,微转移灶通过系列HE检测到,孤立肿瘤细胞通过免疫组化检测到。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并计算曲线下面积以评估列线图的判别能力。

结果

根据方法1,ROC曲线下面积为0.71(范围0.64 - 0.79),根据方法2为0.75(范围0.67 - 0.88)。

结论

由于MSKCC列线图中的变量“检测方法”是SLN转移大小的替代指标,在对SLN组织学分析采用与制定MSKCC列线图所用方法大不相同的程序的患者中应用列线图时,可使用SLN转移的大小类别。这导致预测准确性提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验