Frake Amanda M, De Guzman Lilia I, Rinderer Thomas E
Honey-Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 1157 Ben Hur Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70820-5502, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2009 Feb;102(1):13-9. doi: 10.1603/029.102.0103.
To compare resistance to small hive beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) between Russian and commercial Italian honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), the numbers of invading beetles, their population levels through time and small hive beetle reproduction inside the colonies were monitored. We found that the genotype of queens introduced into nucleus colonies had no immediate effect on small hive beetle invasion. However, the influence of honey bee stock on small hive beetle invasion was pronounced once test bees populated the hives. In colonies deliberately freed from small hive beetle during each observation period, the average number of invading beetles was higher in the Italian colonies (29 +/- 5 beetles) than in the Russian honey bee colonies (16 +/- 3 beetles). A similar trend was observed in colonies that were allowed to be freely colonized by beetles throughout the experimental period (Italian, 11.46 +/- 1.35; Russian, 5.21 +/- 0.66 beetles). A linear regression analysis showed no relationships between the number of beetles in the colonies and adult bee population (r2 = 0.1034, P = 0.297), brood produced (r2 = 0.1488, P = 0.132), or amount of pollen (P = 0.1036, P = 0.295). There were more Italian colonies that supported small hive beetle reproduction than Russian colonies. Regardless of stock, the use of entrance reducers had a significant effect on the average number of small hive beetle (with reducer, 16 +/- 3; without reducer, 27 +/- 5 beetles). However, there was no effect on bee population (with reducer, 13.20 +/- 0.71; without reducer, 14.60 +/- 0.70 frames) or brood production (with reducer, 6.12 +/- 0.30; without reducer, 6.44 +/- 0.34 frames). Overall, Russian honey bees were more resistant to small hive beetle than Italian honey bees as indicated by fewer invading beetles, lower small hive beetle population through time, and lesser reproduction.
为了比较俄罗斯蜜蜂和商业意大利蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)对小蜂螨(鞘翅目:露尾甲科)的抗性,监测了入侵螨虫的数量、它们随时间的种群水平以及蜂群内小蜂螨的繁殖情况。我们发现,引入核心蜂群的蜂王基因型对小蜂螨入侵没有直接影响。然而,一旦测试蜜蜂在蜂箱中定居,蜜蜂种群对小蜂螨入侵的影响就很明显。在每个观察期故意清除小蜂螨的蜂群中,意大利蜂群(29±5只螨虫)的平均入侵螨虫数量高于俄罗斯蜜蜂蜂群(16±3只螨虫)。在整个实验期间允许螨虫自由定殖的蜂群中也观察到了类似趋势(意大利蜂群,11.46±1.35只;俄罗斯蜂群,5.21±0.66只螨虫)。线性回归分析表明,蜂群中螨虫数量与成年蜜蜂数量(r2 = 0.1034,P = 0.297)、育虫数量(r2 = 0.1488,P = 0.132)或花粉量(P = 0.1036,P = 0.295)之间没有关系。支持小蜂螨繁殖的意大利蜂群比俄罗斯蜂群更多。无论种群如何,使用入口缩小器对小蜂螨的平均数量都有显著影响(使用缩小器,16±3只;不使用缩小器,27±5只螨虫)。然而,对蜜蜂数量(使用缩小器,13.20±0.71框;不使用缩小器,14.60±0.70框)或育虫产量(使用缩小器,6.12±0.30框;不使用缩小器,6.44±0.34框)没有影响。总体而言,俄罗斯蜜蜂比意大利蜜蜂对小蜂螨更具抗性,表现为入侵螨虫数量更少、随时间推移小蜂螨种群数量更低以及繁殖更少。