Shahnaz Navid, Miranda Terence, Polka Linda
School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 May;19(5):392-418. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.5.3.
Conventional low probe tone frequency tympanometry has not been successful in identifying middle ear effusion in newborn infants due to differences in the physiological properties of the middle ear in newborn infants and adults. With a rapid increase in newborn hearing screening programs, there is a need for a reliable test of middle ear function for the infant population. In recent years, new evidence has shown that tympanometry performed at higher probe tone frequencies may be more sensitive to middle ear disease than conventional low probe tone frequency in newborn infants.
The main goal of this study was to explore the characteristics of the normal middle ear in the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) and well babies using conventional and multifrequency tympanometry (MFT). It was also within the scope of this study to compare conventional and MFT patterns in NICU and well babies to already established patterns in adults to identify ways to improve hearing assessment in newborns and young infants.
Three experiments were conducted using standard and MFT involving healthy babies and NICU babies. NICU babies (n = 33), healthy three-week-old babies (n=16), and neonates on high-priority hearing registry (HPHR) (n=42) were tested. Thirty-two ears of 16 healthy Caucasian adults (compared to well-babies) and 47 ears of 26 healthy Caucasian adults (compared to NICU babies) were also included in this study.
The distribution of the Vanhuyse patterns as well as variation of admittance phase and peak compensated susceptance and conductance at different probe tone frequencies was also explored. In general, in both well babies and NICU babies, 226 Hz tympanograms are typically multipeaked in ears that passed or referred on transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), limiting the specificity and sensitivity of this measure for differentiating normal and abnormal middle ear conditions. Tympanograms obtained at 1 kHz are potentially more sensitive and specific to presumably abnormal and normal middle ear conditions. Tympanometry at 1 kHz is also a good predictor of presence or absence of TEOAE.
由于新生儿和成人中耳生理特性的差异,传统的低探测音频率鼓室图检查在识别新生儿中耳积液方面并不成功。随着新生儿听力筛查项目的迅速增加,需要一种针对婴儿群体的可靠的中耳功能测试方法。近年来,新的证据表明,在新生儿中,使用较高探测音频率进行的鼓室图检查可能比传统的低探测音频率对中耳疾病更敏感。
本研究的主要目标是使用传统鼓室图检查和多频鼓室图检查(MFT)来探索新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的正常中耳以及健康婴儿的中耳特征。本研究的范围还包括比较NICU婴儿和健康婴儿的传统鼓室图检查和MFT模式与已建立的成人模式,以确定改善新生儿和幼儿听力评估的方法。
使用标准鼓室图检查和MFT对健康婴儿和NICU婴儿进行了三项实验。测试了NICU婴儿(n = 33)、健康的三周大婴儿(n = 16)以及高优先级听力登记册(HPHR)上的新生儿(n = 42)。本研究还纳入了16名健康白人成年人的32只耳朵(与健康婴儿相比)以及26名健康白人成年人的47只耳朵(与NICU婴儿相比)。
还探索了Vanhuyse模式的分布以及不同探测音频率下导纳相位、峰值补偿电纳和电导的变化。一般来说,在健康婴儿和NICU婴儿中,226 Hz鼓室图在通过或未通过瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)的耳朵中通常是多峰的,这限制了该测量方法区分正常和异常中耳情况的特异性和敏感性。在1 kHz时获得的鼓室图对于推测的异常和正常中耳情况可能更敏感和特异。1 kHz的鼓室图检查也是TEOAE是否存在的良好预测指标。