Oskarsson An T, Van Boven Leaf, McClelland Gary H, Hastie Reid
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):262-85. doi: 10.1037/a0014821.
The authors review research on judgments of random and nonrandom sequences involving binary events with a focus on studies documenting gambler's fallacy and hot hand beliefs. The domains of judgment include random devices, births, lotteries, sports performances, stock prices, and others. After discussing existing theories of sequence judgments, the authors conclude that in many everyday settings people have naive complex models of the mechanisms they believe generate observed events, and they rely on these models for explanations, predictions, and other inferences about event sequences. The authors next introduce an explanation-based, mental models framework for describing people's beliefs about binary sequences, based on 4 perceived characteristics of the sequence generator: randomness, intentionality, control, and goal complexity. Furthermore, they propose a Markov process framework as a useful theoretical notation for the description of mental models and for the analysis of actual event sequences.
作者回顾了关于涉及二元事件的随机和非随机序列判断的研究,重点关注记录赌徒谬误和热手信念的研究。判断领域包括随机装置、出生、彩票、体育表现、股票价格等。在讨论了序列判断的现有理论后,作者得出结论,在许多日常情况下,人们对他们认为产生观察到的事件的机制有朴素的复杂模型,并且他们依靠这些模型来解释、预测和对事件序列进行其他推断。作者接下来引入了一个基于解释的心理模型框架,用于描述人们对二元序列的信念,该框架基于序列生成器的4个感知特征:随机性、意向性、可控性和目标复杂性。此外,他们提出了一个马尔可夫过程框架,作为描述心理模型和分析实际事件序列的有用理论符号。