Suppr超能文献

肾绞痛中区域阻滞与胃肠外阿片类镇痛时间的关联:一项前瞻性研究。

Association between access block and time to parenteral opioid analgesia in renal colic: a pilot study.

作者信息

Chu Kevin, Brown Anthony

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2009 Feb;21(1):38-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01146.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To seek an association between access block and time to parenteral opioid analgesia (POA) in ED patients presenting with renal colic.

METHODS

Renal colic patients given POA were retrospectively identified over 3 months. Time of administration of POA was abstracted from patients' charts. Access block data, time of arrival and demographics were retrieved electronically. A logistic regression was used to seek an association between time to POA (dichotomized into <1 h and >1 h of arrival) with daily access block (proportion of patients requiring hospital admission in a 24 h period who have a total ED time >8 h, dichotomized at its median), time of administration of POA (00.00-07.59 hours [T1], 08.00-15.59 hours [T2], 16.00-23.59 hours [T3] ), age and sex.

RESULTS

Of 69 patients, 42 (60.1%, 95% CI 51-70%) received POA within 1 h. Access block occurred daily (median 28.8%, range 6.8-53.1%). Mean hourly ED attendance rates for all patients during T1, T2 and T3 were 4.0, 11.7 and 7.8 patients/h respectively. As predictors of time to POA (>1 h vs<or=1 h), the adjusted OR for access block (>or=29% vs <29%) was 1.0 (95% CI 0.4-2.9), T3 versus T2 was 5.0 (95% CI 1.4-17.7), T1 versus T2 was 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-23.8), age (>or=47 years vs <47 years) was 0.8 (95% CI 0.3-2.3) and for sex (female vs male) was 0.4 (95% CI 0.1-1.6).

CONCLUSION

Time to POA was related to time of administration, but not to access block. Access block might be too crude a measure to quantify ED overcrowding, and so its influence on time to POA may not be exhibited.

摘要

目的

探究肾绞痛急诊患者的通路阻滞与胃肠外阿片类药物镇痛(POA)时间之间的关联。

方法

回顾性纳入3个月内接受POA的肾绞痛患者。POA给药时间从患者病历中提取。通路阻滞数据、到达时间和人口统计学数据通过电子方式获取。采用逻辑回归分析POA时间(分为到达后<1小时和>1小时)与每日通路阻滞(24小时内需住院患者中总急诊时间>8小时患者的比例,以中位数划分)、POA给药时间(00:00 - 07:59小时[T1]、08:00 - 15:59小时[T2]、16:00 - 23:59小时[T3])、年龄和性别之间的关联。

结果

69例患者中,42例(60.1%,95%可信区间51 - 70%)在1小时内接受了POA。通路阻滞每日发生(中位数28.8%,范围6.8 - 53.1%)。T1、T2和T3期间所有患者的平均每小时急诊就诊率分别为4.0、11.7和7.8例/小时。作为POA时间(>1小时与≤1小时)的预测因素,通路阻滞(≥29%与<29%)的校正比值比为1.0(95%可信区间0.4 - 2.9),T3与T2相比为5.0(95%可信区间1.4 - 17.7),T1与T2相比为1.0(95%可信区间0.3 - 23.8),年龄(≥47岁与<47岁)为0.8(95%可信区间0.3 - 2.3),性别(女性与男性)为0.4(95%可信区间0.1 - 1.6)。

结论

POA时间与给药时间相关,但与通路阻滞无关。通路阻滞可能是一种过于粗略的衡量急诊拥挤程度的指标,因此其对POA时间的影响可能未显现出来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验