Departments of Emergency Medicine parallelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Institute for Healthcare Studies daggerFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181bed10c.
To determine whether there is a difference in time to initial analgesic for patients with acute pain from sickle cell disease (SCD) versus renal colic (RC) and to identify factors contributing to variance in time to analgesic.
A retrospective cohort study of the adult emergency department (ED) patients with acute pain from SCD and RC in an urban ED (final ED discharge ICD-9 diagnosis codes were included). A structured medical record review abstracted the demographics, arrival shift, triage level, initial pain score, triage time, and time of initial analgesic dose. Data were compared with Kaplan-Meier plots of time to initial analgesic for both RC and SCD with the log-rank test to test for differences by disease category. A multivariable Cox regression model estimated differences in time to initial analgesic by disease category while controlling for other possible confounders.
Median time to initial analgesic was 80 minutes for patients with SCD (interquartile range, 48 to 145) versus 50 minutes for patients with RC (interquartile range: 30 to 96). Patients with SCD reported a higher pain score on arrival when compared with RC patients and were more frequently assigned a higher triage priority level (P=0.05). Covariates that contributed the most delays to the model were afternoon arrival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.35, P<0.01], low acuity triage level (HR: 0.42, P<0.01), SCD diagnosis (HR: 0.61, P<0.01), and inability to obtain intravenous access (HR: 0.71, P=0.01).
ED patients with SCD experienced longer delays in the administration of the initial analgesic compared with RC patients, despite higher arrival pain scores and triage acuity levels.
比较镰状细胞病(SCD)与肾绞痛(RC)急性疼痛患者初始镇痛的时间差异,并确定影响镇痛时间差异的因素。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了城市急诊科(ED)中 SCD 和 RC 急性疼痛的成年 ED 患者(最终 ED 出院 ICD-9 诊断代码包括在内)。通过结构化病历回顾,提取了人口统计学信息、到达班次、分诊级别、初始疼痛评分、分诊时间和初始镇痛剂量时间。使用 Kaplan-Meier 图比较 RC 和 SCD 患者的初始镇痛时间,并使用对数秩检验检验疾病类别之间的差异。多变量 Cox 回归模型估计了疾病类别对初始镇痛时间的差异,同时控制了其他可能的混杂因素。
SCD 患者的初始镇痛中位时间为 80 分钟(四分位距,48 至 145),RC 患者为 50 分钟(四分位距:30 至 96)。与 RC 患者相比,SCD 患者到达时报告的疼痛评分更高,且更频繁地被分配到更高的分诊优先级(P=0.05)。对模型贡献最大的延迟变量是下午到达(风险比[HR]:0.35,P<0.01)、低 acuity 分诊级别(HR:0.42,P<0.01)、SCD 诊断(HR:0.61,P<0.01)和无法建立静脉通路(HR:0.71,P=0.01)。
尽管 SCD 患者的初始疼痛评分和分诊 acuity 水平更高,但与 RC 患者相比,SCD 患者接受初始镇痛的时间延迟更长。