• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科医疗差错。美国骨科医师学会成员调查结果。

Medical errors in orthopaedics. Results of an AAOS member survey.

作者信息

Wong David A, Herndon James H, Canale S Terry, Brooks Robert L, Hunt Thomas R, Epps Howard R, Fountain Steven S, Albanese Stephen A, Johanson Norman A

机构信息

Denver Spine, Suite 100, 7800 East Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, CO 80111, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):547-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01439.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.G.01439
PMID:19255214
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been widespread interest in medical errors since the publication of To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System by the Institute of Medicine in 2000. The Patient Safety Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has compiled the results of a member survey to identify trends in orthopaedic errors that would help to direct quality assurance efforts.

METHODS

Surveys were sent to 5540 Academy fellows, and 917 were returned (a response rate of 16.6%), with 53% (483) reporting an observed medical error in the previous six months.

RESULTS

A general classification of errors showed equipment (29%) and communication (24.7%) errors with the highest frequency. Medication errors (9.7%) and wrong-site surgery (5.6%) represented serious potential patient harm. Two deaths were reported, and both involved narcotic administration errors. By location, 78% of errors occurred in the hospital (54% in the surgery suite and 10% in the patient room or floor). The reporting orthopaedic surgeon was involved in 60% of the errors; a nurse, in 37%; another orthopaedic surgeon, in 19%; other physicians, in 16%; and house staff, in 13%. Wrong-site surgeries involved the wrong side (59%); another wrong site, e.g., the wrong digit on the correct side (23%); the wrong procedure (14%); or the wrong patient (5% of the time). The most frequent anatomic locations were the knee and the fingers and/or hand (35% for each), the foot and/or ankle (15%), followed by the distal end of the femur (10%) and the spine (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical errors continue to occur and therefore represent a threat to patient safety. Quality assurance efforts and more refined research can be addressed toward areas with higher error occurrence (equipment and communication) and high risk (medication and wrong-site surgery).

摘要

背景

自2000年美国国家医学院发表《人皆有过:建立更安全的医疗体系》以来,医疗差错受到了广泛关注。美国矫形外科医师学会患者安全委员会汇总了一项会员调查结果,以确定矫形外科差错的趋势,从而有助于指导质量保证工作。

方法

向5540名学会会员发送了调查问卷,回收917份(回复率为16.6%),其中53%(483份)报告在前六个月观察到医疗差错。

结果

差错的总体分类显示,设备差错(29%)和沟通差错(24.7%)出现频率最高。用药差错(9.7%)和手术部位错误(5.6%)对患者有严重潜在危害。报告了两起死亡事件,均涉及麻醉用药差错。按发生地点划分,78%的差错发生在医院(54%发生在手术室,10%发生在病房或楼层)。报告差错的矫形外科医生参与了60%的差错;护士参与了37%;另一名矫形外科医生参与了19%;其他医生参与了16%;住院医生参与了13%。手术部位错误包括手术侧别错误(59%);另一个错误部位,如正确侧别的错误手指(23%);错误的手术操作(14%);或错误的患者(5%)。最常见的解剖部位是膝关节以及手指和/或手部(各占35%)、足部和/或踝部(15%),其次是股骨远端(10%)和脊柱(5%)。

结论

医疗差错仍在发生,因此对患者安全构成威胁。质量保证工作和更精细的研究可针对差错发生率较高的领域(设备和沟通)以及高风险领域(用药和手术部位错误)展开。

相似文献

1
Medical errors in orthopaedics. Results of an AAOS member survey.骨科医疗差错。美国骨科医师学会成员调查结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):547-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01439.
2
Wrong-site surgery in orthopaedics.骨科手术中的手术部位错误。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1274-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22644.
3
Analysis of the techniques for thoracic- and lumbar-level localization during posterior spine surgery and the occurrence of wrong-level surgery: results from a national survey.后路脊柱手术中胸腰椎定位技术分析及误手术水平发生情况:一项全国性调查结果。
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):741-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.068. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
To err is human: quality and safety issues in spine care.人孰无过:脊柱护理中的质量与安全问题。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11 Suppl):S2-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4cd.
5
Patient safety in Taiwan: a survey on orthopedic surgeons.台湾的患者安全:一项针对骨科医生的调查。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 Mar;106(3):212-6. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60242-4.
6
Patient participation in surgical site marking: can this be an additional tool to help avoid wrong-site surgery?患者参与手术部位标记:这是否可以成为帮助避免错误部位手术的额外工具?
J Patient Saf. 2010 Dec;6(4):221-5.
7
Incidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons.手外科医生中手术部位错误的发生率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):193-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00002.
8
Experience of wrong site surgery and surgical marking practices among clinicians in the UK.英国临床医生的手术部位错误经历及手术标记做法
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):363-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018333.
9
A comprehensive quality assurance program for personnel and procedures in radiation oncology: value of voluntary error reporting and checklists.放射肿瘤学中人员和流程的全面质量保证计划:自愿错误报告和检查表的价值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Medical error in dermatology practice: development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts.皮肤科医疗差错:制定分类系统以推动患者安全工作中的优先事项设定。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 May;68(5):729-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058. Epub 2013 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
How Surgeons and Surgical Leaders Manage Complications, Medical Errors, Malpractice, and Second Victim Syndrome.外科医生和外科领导者如何应对并发症、医疗差错、医疗事故及“二次受害者综合征”。
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 Mar 28;11:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100186. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Patient safety attitude scale in dentistry: development and validation study in Türkiye.牙科患者安全态度量表:土耳其的开发与验证研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05582-6.
3
Patient Safety Incidents in Operating Rooms Reported in the Past Five Years (2017-2021) in Korea.
韩国过去五年(2017 - 2021年)报告的手术室患者安全事件
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 17;17:1639-1646. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S462485. eCollection 2024.
4
Importance-Performance Analysis of Patient-Safety Nursing in the Operating Room: A Cross-Sectional Study.手术室患者安全护理的重要性-绩效分析:一项横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Mar 26;17:715-725. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S450340. eCollection 2024.
5
Medical errors, affected sites, and adverse consequences among patients in the orthopaedic department: Does age matter?骨科患者的医疗差错、影响部位和不良后果:年龄是否重要?
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 21;12:1306215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1306215. eCollection 2024.
6
Perioperative patient safety management activities: A modified theory of planned behavior.围手术期患者安全管理活动:改进的计划行为理论。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0252648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252648. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of the "Mind the risk" Campaign of Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia on Risk Perception and Use of the Surgical Checklist by Brazilian Orthopedists.巴西骨科学与创伤外科学会“关注风险”运动对巴西骨科医生风险认知及手术清单使用情况的影响。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Apr;56(2):218-223. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701285. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at the Wrong Level: Part III Lumbosacral Spine.可能导致脊柱手术节段错误的解剖变异:第三部分 腰骶椎
Cureus. 2020 Jul 28;12(7):e9433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9433.
9
Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at The Wrong Level: Part II Thoracic Spine.可能导致脊柱手术节段错误的解剖变异:第二部分 胸椎
Cureus. 2020 Jun 18;12(6):e8684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8684.
10
Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at the Wrong Level: Part I, Cervical Spine.可能导致脊柱手术节段错误的解剖变异:第一部分,颈椎
Cureus. 2020 Jun 17;12(6):e8667. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8667.