Suppr超能文献

癌症治疗评估项目中临床试验的处理步骤和时间。

Steps and time to process clinical trials at the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

作者信息

Dilts David M, Sandler Alan B, Cheng Steven K, Crites Joshua S, Ferranti Lori B, Wu Amy Y, Finnigan Shanda, Friedman Steven, Mooney Margaret, Abrams Jeffrey

机构信息

Center for Management Research in Healthcare, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235-1518, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1761-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9133. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the processes and document the calendar time required for the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) and Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) to evaluate and approve phase III clinical trials.

METHODS

Process steps were documented by (1) interviewing CTEP and CIRB staff regarding the steps required to activate a trial from initial concept submission to trial activation by a cooperative group, (2) reviewing standard operating procedures, and (3) inspecting trial records and documents for selected trials to identify any additional steps. Calendar time was collected from initial concept submission to activation using retrospective data from the CTEP Protocol and Information Office.

RESULTS

At least 296 distinct processes are required for phase III trial activation: at least 239 working steps, 52 major decision points, 20 processing loops, and 11 stopping points. Of the 195 trials activated during the January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007, study period, a sample of 167 (85.6%) was used for gathering timing data. Median calendar days from initial formal concept submission to CTEP to trial activation by a cooperative group was 602 days (interquartile range, 454 to 861 days). This time has not significantly changed over the past 8 years. There is a high variation in the time required to activate a clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

Because of their complexity, the overall development time for phase III clinical trials is lengthy, process laden, and highly variable. To streamline the process, a solution must be sought that includes all parties involved in developing trials.

摘要

目的

研究美国国立癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目(CTEP)和中央机构审查委员会(CIRB)评估和批准III期临床试验所需的流程,并记录所需的日历时间。

方法

通过以下方式记录流程步骤:(1)就从最初概念提交到合作组启动试验所需的步骤采访CTEP和CIRB工作人员;(2)审查标准操作程序;(3)检查选定试验的试验记录和文件以识别任何其他步骤。使用CTEP方案和信息办公室的回顾性数据收集从最初概念提交到启动的日历时间。

结果

III期试验启动至少需要296个不同的流程:至少239个工作步骤、52个主要决策点、20个处理循环和11个停止点。在2000年1月1日至2007年12月31日的研究期间启动的195项试验中,抽取了167项(85.6%)用于收集时间数据。从最初正式向CTEP提交概念到合作组启动试验的中位日历天数为602天(四分位间距,454至861天)。在过去8年中,这段时间没有显著变化。启动一项临床试验所需的时间差异很大。

结论

由于其复杂性,III期临床试验的总体开发时间漫长、流程繁琐且高度可变。为了简化流程,必须寻求一种包括参与试验开发的所有各方的解决方案。

相似文献

4
Phase III clinical trial development: a process of chutes and ladders.三期临床试验开发:一个充满坎坷的过程。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5381-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1273. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

2
Strategy management in collaborative clinical research partnerships.协作临床研究伙伴关系中的战略管理
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 18;24:100833. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100833. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验