Suppr超能文献

三期临床试验开发:一个充满坎坷的过程。

Phase III clinical trial development: a process of chutes and ladders.

机构信息

Knight Cancer Institute, Center for Management Research in Healthcare, Division of Management, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5381-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1273. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Institute of Medicine report on cooperative groups and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) report from the Operational Efficiency Working Group both recommend changes to the processes for opening a clinical trial. This article provides evidence for the need for such changes by completing the first comprehensive review of all the time and steps required to open a phase III oncology clinical trial and discusses the effect of time to protocol activation on subject accrual.

METHODS

The Dilts and Sandler method was used at four cancer centers, two cooperative groups, and the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Accrual data were also collected.

RESULTS

Opening a phase III cooperative group therapeutic trial requires 769 steps, 36 approvals, and a median of approximately 2.5 years from formal concept review to study opening. Time to activation at one group ranged from 435 to 1,604 days, and time to open at one cancer center ranged from 21 to 836 days. At centers, group trials are significantly more likely to have zero accruals (38.8%) than nongroup trials (20.6%; P < 0.0001). Of the closed NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved phase III clinical trials from 2000 to 2007, 39.1% resulted in <21 accruals.

CONCLUSIONS

The length, variability, and low accrual results demonstrate the need for the NCI clinical trials system to be reengineered. Improvements will be of only limited effectiveness if done in isolation; there is a need to return to the collaborative spirit with all parties creating an efficient and effective system. Recommendations put forth by the Institute of Medicine and Operational Efficiency Working Group reports, if implemented, will aid this renewal.

摘要

目的

医学研究所关于合作组的报告和国家癌症研究所(NCI)运营效率工作组的报告都建议对临床试验启动流程进行更改。本文通过全面审查启动 III 期肿瘤学临床试验所需的所有时间和步骤,为这种更改提供了证据,并讨论了方案启动时间对入组的影响。

方法

在四个癌症中心、两个合作组和 NCI 癌症治疗评估计划中使用了 Dilts 和 Sandler 方法。还收集了入组数据。

结果

启动 III 期合作组治疗试验需要 769 个步骤、36 个批准,从正式概念审查到研究启动的中位数约为 2.5 年。一个组的激活时间范围为 435 至 1604 天,一个癌症中心的开放时间范围为 21 至 836 天。在中心,与非合作组试验(20.6%;P<0.0001)相比,合作组试验的零入组率(38.8%)显著更高。在 2000 年至 2007 年期间,已关闭的 NCI 癌症治疗评估计划批准的 III 期临床试验中,有 39.1%的试验入组人数<21。

结论

长度、可变性和低入组结果表明,需要对 NCI 临床试验系统进行重新设计。如果孤立地进行改进,效果将是有限的;需要恢复所有各方共同创建高效、有效的系统的合作精神。如果实施医学研究所和运营效率工作组报告提出的建议,将有助于这种更新。

相似文献

1
Phase III clinical trial development: a process of chutes and ladders.三期临床试验开发:一个充满坎坷的过程。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5381-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1273. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验