Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, University of Cincinnati (MHE), PO Box 670535, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May;24(5):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0927-7. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
Genetic variants of the warfarin sensitivity gene CYP2C9 have been associated with increased bleeding risk during warfarin initiation. Studies also suggest that such patients remain at risk throughout treatment.
Would testing patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) for CYP2C9 before initiating warfarin improve outcomes?
Markov state transition decision model.
Ambulatory or inpatient settings necessitating new initiation of anticoagulation.
The base case was a 69-year-old man with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF. Interventions included: (1) warfarin, (2) aspirin, or (3) no antithrombotic therapy without genetic testing; and genetic testing followed by (4) aspirin or (5) no antithrombotic therapy in those with culprit CYP2C9 alleles.
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
In the base case, testing and treating patients with CYP2C92 and/or CYP2C93 with aspirin rather than warfarin was best (8.97 QALYs). However, warfarin without genetic testing was a close second (8.96 QALYs), a difference of roughly 5 days. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that genetic testing followed by aspirin was best for patients at lower risk of embolic events. Warfarin without testing was preferred if the rate of embolic events was greater than 5% per year, or the risk of major bleeding while receiving warfarin was lower.
For patients at average risk for ischemic stroke due to AF and at average risk for major hemorrhage, treatment based on genetic testing offers no benefit compared to warfarin initiation without testing. The gain from testing may be larger in patients at lower risk of embolic events or at greater risk of bleeding.
华法林敏感性基因 CYP2C9 的遗传变异与华法林起始时出血风险增加有关。研究还表明,此类患者在整个治疗过程中仍存在风险。
在开始使用华法林之前对患有非瓣膜性心房颤动 (AF) 的患者进行 CYP2C9 检测是否会改善结果?
马尔可夫状态转移决策模型。
需要新启动抗凝治疗的门诊或住院环境。
基础病例为 69 岁新诊断为非瓣膜性 AF 的男性。干预措施包括:(1)华法林,(2)阿司匹林,或(3)无遗传检测的无抗血栓治疗;以及在有致病 CYP2C9 等位基因的患者中进行遗传检测后(4)使用阿司匹林或(5)无抗血栓治疗。
质量调整生命年 (QALYs)。
在基础病例中,用阿司匹林而非华法林检测和治疗 CYP2C92 和/或 CYP2C93 的患者是最佳的(8.97 QALYs)。然而,不进行遗传检测的华法林治疗也非常接近(8.96 QALYs),相差约 5 天。敏感性分析表明,对于栓塞事件风险较低的患者,遗传检测后使用阿司匹林是最佳选择。如果栓塞事件的发生率大于每年 5%,或者接受华法林治疗时大出血的风险较低,则不进行检测的华法林治疗是首选。
对于因 AF 而发生缺血性中风风险平均且大出血风险平均的患者,与不进行检测就开始使用华法林治疗相比,基于遗传检测的治疗没有带来任何益处。在栓塞事件风险较低或出血风险较高的患者中,检测的收益可能更大。