Suppr超能文献

荷兰辅助技术的未使用情况:一个不存在的问题?

Non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands: a non-issue?

作者信息

Dijcks B P J, De Witte L P, Gelderblom G J, Wessels R D, Soede M

机构信息

iRv, Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006 Jan-Jun;1(1-2):97-102. doi: 10.1080/09638280500167548.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To obtain insight into the prevalence of the non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands. Relationships between non-use and possible determinants were also investigated. The results of the study might lead to improvement of products and of the service delivery system for assistive technology.

METHOD

A study was performed into user satisfaction and the non-use of 14 categories of assistive technology provided by health care insurers. The design was a survey among a stratified sample of users who had received an assistive device, recruited through a sample of health insurance companies. Two independent samples were selected: one in 2001 and one in 2003. Three aspects of non-use were measured. The total number of respondents was 2272.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent of the respondents used the assistive device at the time of the survey. Less than 1% of the respondents never used the device. A majority of the respondents used the assistive device (about) as much as expected and 6% used the assistive device less than expected. Relationships between non-use and other investigated aspects were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The average level of non-use of assistive technology found in this study is less than often reported in the literature and varies between the various categories of assistive technology. Improving the quality of the assistive technology and the services, and providing assistive technology that solves the users' problem as much as possible, could enhance the use of assistive technology provided.

摘要

目的

深入了解荷兰辅助技术未使用情况的普遍程度。同时还研究了未使用情况与可能的决定因素之间的关系。该研究结果可能会促使辅助技术产品及服务提供系统得到改进。

方法

对医疗保险公司提供的14类辅助技术的用户满意度及未使用情况进行了一项研究。研究设计为对通过健康保险公司样本招募的已获得辅助设备的用户进行分层抽样调查。选取了两个独立样本:一个在2001年,另一个在2003年。对未使用情况的三个方面进行了测量。总受访者人数为2272人。

结果

在调查时,92%的受访者使用了辅助设备。不到1%的受访者从未使用过该设备。大多数受访者使用辅助设备的频率(大致)与预期相同,6%的受访者使用辅助设备的频率低于预期。发现了未使用情况与其他调查方面之间的关系。

结论

本研究中发现的辅助技术未使用的平均水平低于文献中经常报道的水平,且在各类辅助技术之间存在差异。提高辅助技术及服务的质量,并提供尽可能解决用户问题的辅助技术,可能会增加所提供辅助技术的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验