• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
User perceptions of aspects related to the use of the activity chair: A descriptive cross-sectional study.用户对活动椅使用相关方面的认知:一项描述性横断面研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar;88(3):149-157. doi: 10.1177/03080226241296361. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
3
Reading aids for adults with low vision.针对视力低下成年人的阅读辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
WHO wheelchair provision guidelines set an aspirational standard for assistive technology service delivery.
Assist Technol. 2023 May 4;35(3):203-204. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2023.2222598.
2
Understanding the experiences, needs, and strengths of people with incomplete spinal cord injury who can ambulate.了解能够行走的不完全性脊髓损伤患者的经历、需求和优势。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Feb;46(3):546-555. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2171495. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
3
Social desirability bias in qualitative health research.定性健康研究中的社会期望偏差。
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Dec 9;56:101. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004164. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of the abandonment of assistive technologies for mobility on the incidence of serious falls in older adults living at home: Results of the ECOCAT study.放弃移动辅助技术对居家老年人严重跌倒发生率的影响:ECOCAT研究结果
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022 Jun 25;9:20556683221110866. doi: 10.1177/20556683221110866. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Assistive devices among people living at home with advanced cancer: Use, non-use and who have unmet needs for assistive devices?居家晚期癌症患者使用辅助器具的情况:使用、未使用以及有哪些未满足的辅助器具需求?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13572. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13572. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Participation bias, self-selection bias, and response bias.参与偏倚、自我选择偏倚和应答偏倚。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.025.
7
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).基于共识的调查研究报告清单(CROSS)
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3179-3187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review.探索慢性疾病患者使用辅助技术的障碍:元综合综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 May;17(4):390-408. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment.助视器的美学和感知耻辱感。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Feb;17(2):152-158. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
10
The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes - a systematic review.辅助技术服务提供流程的影响及与积极结果相关的因素——系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jul;15(5):590-603. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1682067. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

用户对活动椅使用相关方面的认知:一项描述性横断面研究。

User perceptions of aspects related to the use of the activity chair: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Bjørnskov Stina, Mortenson William Ben, Helle Tina

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy and Research and Development, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia| xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) Traditional Territory, Principal Investigator, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries Principal Investigator, GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar;88(3):149-157. doi: 10.1177/03080226241296361. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1177/03080226241296361
PMID:40343153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033720/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the use and aspects impacting the use of the activity chair, which is a device supporting seated activities in everyday life. The aim was to understand (a) purpose of provision, (b) frequency and magnitude of use, (c) barriers impacting use, (d) instruction provided and (e) overall satisfaction with the activity chair.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study involving 141 adult activity chair users. Data were collected through telephone interviews using a study-specific questionnaire with 21 items. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the quantitative results, and data-driven text analysis was conducted to analyse open-ended question responses.

RESULTS

Most respondents (87%) were provided the activity chair for kitchen work, 87% used the device on a daily basis, 75% used the device for additional activities beyond the provision purpose, 65% experienced barriers impacting use, instructions varied, with 28% receiving none and 16% had received activity-based training, 85% were satisfied with the activity chair.

CONCLUSION

The activity chair appears to be regularly utilised and appreciated by respondents. However, improved device provision, particularly concerning activity-based training in relevant context and systematic follow up, may be required to reduce barriers impacting use. Findings emphasise the importance of learning from users.

摘要

引言

对于活动椅的使用及其影响使用的相关方面了解甚少,活动椅是一种支持日常生活中就坐活动的设备。本研究旨在了解:(a)提供该设备的目的;(b)使用频率和使用程度;(c)影响使用的障碍;(d)提供的指导;以及(e)对活动椅的总体满意度。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,涉及141名成年活动椅使用者。通过电话访谈,使用一份包含21个条目的特定研究问卷收集数据。描述性统计用于总结定量结果,并进行数据驱动的文本分析以分析开放式问题的回答。

结果

大多数受访者(87%)因厨房工作而获得活动椅,87%的人每天使用该设备,75%的人在设备提供目的之外还用于其他活动,65%的人遇到影响使用的障碍,指导各不相同,28%的人未接受任何指导,16%的人接受过基于活动的培训,85%的人对活动椅感到满意。

结论

活动椅似乎经常被受访者使用并受到赞赏。然而,可能需要改进设备的提供,特别是在相关背景下进行基于活动的培训和系统的跟进,以减少影响使用的障碍。研究结果强调了向用户学习的重要性。