Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性多发性神经病变的临床筛查与诊断:北加泰罗尼亚糖尿病研究

Clinical screening and diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy: the North Catalonia Diabetes Study.

作者信息

Jurado J, Ybarra J, Romeo J H, Pou J M

机构信息

Olot, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2009 Mar;39(3):183-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02074.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and develop a simple and accurate method for the evaluation of DPN risk in primary care settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive study in a random sample (N = 307) of type 2 diabetes mellitus participants. DPN was diagnosed by both clinical neurological examination and simplified DPN Selection Method in each patient. Correlation between the two methods was obtained.

RESULTS

Prevalence of DPN was 23.13% (confidence interval,18.38-27.87) according to clinical neurological examination. Noteworthy, clinical neurological evaluation scores were related to nerve conduction studies (r = 0.882; P < 0.0005). DPN presence was positively related to age, metabolic control (HbA1c levels), known duration of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, peripheral ischemia and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but was negatively related to current high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of our DPN Selection Method (using four clinical parameters: age, retinopathy, HbA1c and HDL-C plasma levels) for diagnosis of DPN was 74.20% and 74.90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The expected prevalence of DPN was observed. The sensitivity of the DPN Selection Method correlated well with formal clinical neurological exam in detection of the condition. We therefore conclude the DPN Selection Method is a useful tool in primary care settings in the evaluation and diagnosis of DPN.

摘要

背景

评估糖尿病性多发性神经病(DPN)的患病率,并开发一种简单准确的方法来评估基层医疗环境中DPN的风险。

材料与方法

对2型糖尿病参与者的随机样本(N = 307)进行横断面描述性研究。通过临床神经学检查和简化的DPN筛选方法对每位患者进行DPN诊断。获得两种方法之间的相关性。

结果

根据临床神经学检查,DPN的患病率为23.13%(置信区间,18.38 - 27.87)。值得注意的是,临床神经学评估分数与神经传导研究相关(r = 0.882;P < 0.0005)。DPN的存在与年龄、代谢控制(糖化血红蛋白水平)、已知糖尿病病程、糖尿病视网膜病变、心血管疾病、外周缺血以及收缩压和舒张压呈正相关,但与当前高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平呈负相关(P < 0.0001)。我们的DPN筛选方法(使用四个临床参数:年龄、视网膜病变、糖化血红蛋白和血浆HDL-C水平)诊断DPN的敏感性和特异性分别为74.20%和74.90%。

结论

观察到了DPN的预期患病率。DPN筛选方法在检测该疾病方面的敏感性与正式的临床神经学检查相关性良好。因此,我们得出结论,DPN筛选方法是基层医疗环境中评估和诊断DPN的有用工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验