Suppr超能文献

[初级保健中一项专业糖尿病教育项目的撤销:对代谢控制结果的长期影响]

[Withdrawal of a specialised diabetes education program in primary care: long term impact on the metabolic control outcomes].

作者信息

Jurado Campos Jerónimo, Caula Ros Jacint A, Hernández Anguera Josep M, Juvinyà Canal Dolors, Pou Torelló José M

机构信息

Instituto Catalán de la Salud, EAP Olot, Girona, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2009 Dec;41(12):681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 May 29.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the possible relationships between a health policy decision, in relation to the diabetes education strategies and the metabolic control outcomes.

DESIGN

Longitudinal prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A random cohort sample of 276 type II diabetes mellitus subjects.

LOCATION

All primary care centres in three regions of Catalonia.

PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS

Patients were classified as specialised (n=59) or non-specialised (n=217) groups, as regards whether having received previous diabetes education before the start of the study. HbA1c values were evaluated in all subjects at baseline and after 5 years after receiving only conventional education.

RESULTS

Baseline evaluation showed a better metabolic control in the specialised group (P=0.009). The final evaluation showed no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups (P=0.679). When baseline and outcomes values were compared, significant differences were observed in all subjects (P=0.001), the specialised group showed significantly poorer metabolic control (P<0.001), but in the group with previous conventional education no significant differences were observed (P=0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the withdrawal of higher levels of diabetes education may play a major role in poor metabolic control, and that conventional diabetes education does not improve outcomes. Health policy in Primary Care should consider improving the level of diabetes education.

摘要

目的

评估一项与糖尿病教育策略及代谢控制结果相关的卫生政策决策之间可能存在的关系。

设计

纵向前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

276名II型糖尿病患者的随机队列样本。

地点

加泰罗尼亚三个地区的所有初级保健中心。

主要测量指标

根据在研究开始前是否接受过糖尿病教育,将患者分为专科组(n = 59)或非专科组(n = 217)。在基线时以及仅接受常规教育5年后,对所有受试者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值进行评估。

结果

基线评估显示专科组的代谢控制更好(P = 0.009)。最终评估显示两组之间的结果无显著差异(P = 0.679)。当比较基线值和结果值时,在所有受试者中观察到显著差异(P = 0.001),专科组的代谢控制显著较差(P < 0.001),但在接受过常规教育的组中未观察到显著差异(P = 0.058)。

结论

我们的结果表明,减少高水平的糖尿病教育可能在代谢控制不佳中起主要作用,并且常规糖尿病教育并不能改善结果。初级保健中的卫生政策应考虑提高糖尿病教育水平。

相似文献

1
[Withdrawal of a specialised diabetes education program in primary care: long term impact on the metabolic control outcomes].
Aten Primaria. 2009 Dec;41(12):681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 May 29.
2
Health care and therapeutic education program for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A new approach in primary care.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;65(9):486-499. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Self-rated health as a predictor of outcomes of type 2 diabetes patient education programmes in Denmark.
Public Health. 2016 Oct;139:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
7
Outcome of focused pre-Ramadan education on metabolic and glycaemic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 Sep;12(5):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.036. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Development and evaluation of a patient-oriented education system for diabetes management.
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Sep;76(9):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.030. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
10
ROMEO: rethink organization to improve education and outcomes.
Diabet Med. 2004 Jun;21(6):644-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01170.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in a type 2 diabetic population of the North Catalonia diabetes study.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Mar;21(3):140-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00377.x.
2
Clinical screening and diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy: the North Catalonia Diabetes Study.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2009 Mar;39(3):183-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02074.x.
3
UKPDS and the legacy effect.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1618-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0807625.
4
Hyperglycaemia as a cardiovascular risk factor in diabetes.
Lancet. 2008 Sep 20;372(9643):1036-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61440-3.
5
A trial of empowerment-based education in type 2 diabetes--global rather than glycaemic benefits.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Nov;82(2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
6
10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
7
Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials.
JAMA. 2008 Jun 4;299(21):2543-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2543.
8
Association of numeracy and diabetes control.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006.
9
The clinical effectiveness of diabetes education models for Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(9):1-116, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta12090.
10
Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older.
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 1;358(18):1887-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801369. Epub 2008 Mar 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验