Hafeman Danella M, Schwartz Sharon
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;38(3):838-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn372. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
Recent criticism of epidemiologic methods has focused on the limitations of 'black box' epidemiology, a pejorative label given to the simple identification of exposure-disease relationships. The assessment of mediation is an important tool for addressing this criticism. By using mediation analysis to open the black box, underlying mechanisms of the observed associations can be described and causal inference improved. An explicit theoretical motivation for such an analysis has been missing from the epidemiological literature. To provide this motivation, we integrate literature from epidemiology and other social sciences to describe the reasons that an investigator might want to assess mediation. We then describe the connections between these reasons and specific measures of indirect and direct effects that have been previously described.
近期对流行病学方法的批评集中在“黑箱”流行病学的局限性上,这是一个用于简单识别暴露与疾病关系的贬义词。中介评估是应对这一批评的重要工具。通过使用中介分析来打开黑箱,可以描述观察到的关联的潜在机制并改进因果推断。流行病学文献中一直缺少这种分析的明确理论动机。为了提供这种动机,我们整合了流行病学和其他社会科学的文献,以描述研究者可能想要评估中介的原因。然后我们描述这些原因与先前描述的间接和直接效应的具体测量之间的联系。