Shin Sung Jae, Anklam Kelly, Manning Elizabeth J B, Collins Michael T
Department of Microbiology and Infection Signaling Network Research Center, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 May;16(5):613-20. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00461-08. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
Sensors in automated liquid culture systems for mycobacteria, such as MGIT, BacT/Alert 3D, and Trek ESP II, flag growth of any type of bacteria; a positive signal does not mean that the target mycobacteria are present. All signal-positive cultures thus require additional and often laborious testing. An immunoassay was developed to screen liquid mycobacterial cultures for evidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). The method, called the MAC-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), relies on detection of MAC-specific secreted antigens in liquid culture. Secreted MAC antigens were captured by the MAC-ELISA with polyclonal anti- Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis chicken immunoglobulin Y (IgY), detected using rabbit anti-MAC IgG, and then revealed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. When the MAC-ELISA was evaluated using pure cultures of known mycobacterial (n = 75) and nonmycobacterial (n = 17) organisms, no false-positive or false-negative MAC-ELISA results were found. By receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis of 1,275 previously identified clinical isolates, at the assay optimal cutoff the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the MAC-ELISA were 92.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 90.3 to 94.5) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.2 to 100), respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.992. Prospective evaluation of the MAC-ELISA with an additional 652 clinical samples inoculated into MGIT ParaTB medium and signaling positive per the manufacturer's instructions found that the MAC-ELISA was effective in determining those cultures that actually contained MAC species and warranting the resources required to identify the organism by PCR. Of these 652 MGIT-positive cultures, the MAC-ELISA correctly identified 96.8% (of 219 MAC-ELISA-positive cultures) as truly containing MAC mycobacteria, based on PCR or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as reference tests. Only 6 of 433 MGIT signal-positive cultures (1.4%) were MAC-ELISA false negative, and only 7 of 219 MGIT signal-negative cultures (3.2%) were false positive. The MAC-ELISA is a low-cost, rapid, sensitive, and specific test for MAC in liquid cultures. It could be used in conjunction with or independent of automated culture reading instrumentation. For maximal accuracy and subspecies-specific identification, use of a confirmatory multiplex MAC PCR is recommended.
用于分枝杆菌的自动化液体培养系统中的传感器,如MGIT、BacT/Alert 3D和Trek ESP II,能标记任何类型细菌的生长;阳性信号并不意味着存在目标分枝杆菌。因此,所有信号阳性的培养物都需要进行额外的、通常很费力的检测。开发了一种免疫测定法来筛查液体分枝杆菌培养物中鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)的证据。这种方法称为MAC酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),依靠检测液体培养物中MAC特异性分泌抗原。分泌的MAC抗原通过MAC-ELISA用抗鸟分枝杆菌副结核亚种鸡免疫球蛋白Y(IgY)多克隆抗体捕获,用兔抗MAC IgG检测,然后用辣根过氧化物酶偶联的山羊抗兔IgG显色。当使用已知分枝杆菌(n = 75)和非分枝杆菌(n = 17)的纯培养物评估MAC-ELISA时,未发现假阳性或假阴性的MAC-ELISA结果。通过对1275份先前鉴定的临床分离株进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,在该测定的最佳临界值下,MAC-ELISA的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为92.6%(95%置信区间[95%CI],90.3至94.5)和99.9%(95%CI,99.2至100),ROC曲线下面积为0.992。对另外652份接种到MGIT ParaTB培养基中并根据制造商说明发出阳性信号的临床样本进行MAC-ELISA的前瞻性评估发现,MAC-ELISA在确定那些实际含有MAC菌种并需要通过PCR鉴定该生物体所需资源的培养物方面是有效的。在这652份MGIT阳性培养物中,以PCR或高效液相色谱(HPLC)作为参考检测,MAC-ELISA正确鉴定出96.8%(219份MAC-ELISA阳性培养物中的)确实含有MAC分枝杆菌。在433份MGIT信号阳性培养物中,只有6份(1.4%)是MAC-ELISA假阴性,在219份MGIT信号阴性培养物中,只有7份(3.2%)是假阳性。MAC-ELISA是一种用于液体培养物中MAC的低成本、快速、灵敏且特异的检测方法。它可以与自动化培养读数仪器结合使用或独立使用。为了获得最大的准确性和亚种特异性鉴定,建议使用确认性多重MAC PCR。