Dilks Daniel D, Baker Chris I, Peli Eli, Kanwisher Nancy
McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 4;29(9):2768-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5258-08.2009.
Recent work has shown that foveal cortex, deprived of its normal bottom-up input as a result of macular degeneration (MD), begins responding to stimuli presented to a peripheral retinal location. However, these studies have only presented stimuli to the "preferred retinal location," or PRL, a spared part of the peripheral retina used by individuals with MD for fixating, face recognition, reading, and other visual tasks. Thus, previous research has not yet answered a question critical for understanding the mechanisms underlying this reorganization: Does formerly foveal cortex respond only to stimuli presented at the PRL, or does it also respond to other peripheral locations of similar eccentricity? If foveal cortex responds to stimuli at PRL because it is the long-term habitual use of this region as a functional fovea that drives the formerly foveal cortex to respond to stimuli presented at the PRL (the "use-dependent reorganization" hypothesis), then foveal cortex will not respond to stimuli presented at other locations. Alternatively, it may be that foveal cortex responds to any peripheral retinal input, independent of whether input at that retinal location has been chronically attended for months or years (the "use-independent reorganization" hypothesis). Using fMRI, we found clear activation of formerly foveal cortex to stimuli presented at either the PRL or an isoeccentric non-PRL location in two individuals with MD, supporting the use-independent reorganization hypothesis. This finding suggests that reorganization is driven by passive, not use-dependent mechanisms.
近期研究表明,由于黄斑变性(MD),中央凹皮质失去了正常的自下而上的输入,开始对呈现于周边视网膜位置的刺激做出反应。然而,这些研究仅将刺激呈现给“首选视网膜位置”(PRL),即MD患者用于注视、人脸识别、阅读及其他视觉任务的周边视网膜的保留部分。因此,先前的研究尚未回答一个对于理解这种重组潜在机制至关重要的问题:先前的中央凹皮质是否仅对PRL处呈现的刺激做出反应,还是也对类似偏心率的其他周边位置做出反应?如果中央凹皮质对PRL处的刺激做出反应是因为长期习惯性地将该区域用作功能性中央凹,从而驱使先前的中央凹皮质对PRL处呈现的刺激做出反应(“使用依赖重组”假说),那么中央凹皮质将不会对其他位置呈现的刺激做出反应。或者,可能是中央凹皮质对任何周边视网膜输入都有反应,而与该视网膜位置的输入是否在数月或数年里一直被长期关注无关(“使用非依赖重组”假说)。通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI),我们发现两名MD患者的先前中央凹皮质对PRL处或等偏心率非PRL位置处呈现的刺激有明显激活,支持使用非依赖重组假说。这一发现表明重组是由被动机制而非使用依赖机制驱动的。