Maniglia Marcello, Visscher Kristina M, Seitz Aaron R
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Department of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 4;15:734970. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.734970. eCollection 2021.
Pathologies affecting central vision, and macular degeneration (MD) in particular, represent a growing health concern worldwide, and the leading cause of blindness in the Western World. To cope with the loss of central vision, MD patients often develop compensatory strategies, such as the adoption of a Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL), which they use as a substitute fovea. However, visual acuity and fixation stability in the visual periphery are poorer, leaving many MD patients struggling with tasks such as reading and recognizing faces. Current non-invasive rehabilitative interventions are usually of two types: , aiming at training eye movements or teaching patients to use or develop a PRL, or , with the goal of improving visual abilities in the PRL. These training protocols are usually tested over a series of outcome assessments mainly measuring low-level visual abilities (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and reading. However, extant approaches lead to mixed success, and in general have exhibited large individual differences. Recent breakthroughs in vision science have shown that loss of central vision affects not only low-level visual abilities and oculomotor mechanisms, but also higher-level attentional and cognitive processes. We suggest that effective interventions for rehabilitation after central vision loss should then not only integrate low-level vision and oculomotor training, but also take into account higher level attentional and cognitive mechanisms.
影响中心视力的病变,尤其是黄斑变性(MD),在全球范围内对健康的影响日益受到关注,并且是西方世界失明的主要原因。为了应对中心视力丧失,MD患者通常会制定补偿策略,例如采用 Preferred Retinal Locus(PRL),他们将其用作替代中央凹。然而,视觉周边的视力和注视稳定性较差,这使得许多MD患者在阅读和识别面部等任务中遇到困难。当前的非侵入性康复干预通常有两种类型:一种旨在训练眼球运动或教导患者使用或发展PRL,另一种则旨在提高PRL中的视觉能力。这些训练方案通常通过一系列主要测量低水平视觉能力(视力、对比敏感度)和阅读能力的结果评估进行测试。然而,现有方法的效果参差不齐,并且总体上表现出较大的个体差异。视觉科学的最新突破表明,中心视力丧失不仅会影响低水平视觉能力和眼球运动机制,还会影响更高水平的注意力和认知过程。我们建议,中心视力丧失后的有效康复干预不仅应整合低水平视力和眼球运动训练,还应考虑更高水平的注意力和认知机制。