Suppr超能文献

双眼视发育的原理在黄斑疾病患者中。

Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease.

机构信息

Krembil Research Institute, Donald K Johnson Eye Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Aug 2;63(9):19. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.9.19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration.

METHODS

Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1 microperimeter. Corresponding PRLs were those with similar polar angle and distance from former fovea in the better eye (BE) and the worse eye (WE).

RESULTS

On average, the PRL in the BE was in the foveal proximity at 1.1 ± 0.99 degrees for 55 patients (foveal-driven PRL) and eccentrically at 6.9 ± 3.4 degrees for 46 patients with central lesions involving the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). For the foveal-driven PRL group, the PRL in the BE was not affected by the status of the WE. In 100% of cases, the monocular PRL in the WE was in a corresponding location either on functioning retina or onto the lesion, or would fall onto the lesion during binocular viewing. For the peripheral-driven PRL group, the PRL location depended on the lesion size in both eyes to maximize correspondence and/or the function of peripheral vision during binocular viewing. In this group, PRL correspondence status was different for those with equal, unequal, or extensive lesions in both eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Binocularity requirements for correspondence play an important role in determining the PRL location. We formulated two principles based on whether the BE has foveal sparing (foveal-driven PRL) or central lesions affecting the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). The PRL should be evaluated in the framework of binocular viewing.

摘要

目的

我们检验了这样一个假设,即双眼对应性要求在确定黄斑变性中的优势视网膜部位(PRL)中发挥作用。

方法

使用 MP1 微视野计记录了 101 名黄斑变性患者(79±10 岁)的 202 只眼的单眼 PRL 位置。对应性 PRL 是指在较好眼(BE)和较差眼(WE)中,具有相似极角和从前黄斑距离的 PRL。

结果

平均而言,在 55 名患者中(以黄斑为中心的 PRL),BE 的 PRL 在黄斑附近,为 1.1±0.99 度;在 46 名黄斑中心病变患者中(以周边为中心的 PRL),PRL 偏心,为 6.9±3.4 度。对于以黄斑为中心的 PRL 组,BE 的 PRL 不受 WE 的状态影响。在 100%的情况下,WE 的单眼 PRL 位于功能视网膜或病变上的对应位置,或者在双眼注视时会落在病变上。对于以周边为中心的 PRL 组,PRL 位置取决于双眼的病变大小,以最大限度地实现对应性和/或双眼注视时周边视力的功能。在该组中,PRL 对应性状态因双眼病变大小相等、不等或广泛而不同。

结论

双眼对应性要求在确定 PRL 位置中起着重要作用。我们基于 BE 是否有黄斑保留(以黄斑为中心的 PRL)或影响黄斑的中央病变(以周边为中心的 PRL)制定了两个原则。PRL 应在双眼注视的框架内进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449c/9400123/3326af6c6951/iovs-63-9-19-f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验