University of Health Sciences Turkey, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Adana, Turkey
Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, Turkey
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 23;52(1):14-22. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.73368.
This study evaluated acoustic biofeedback training using microperimetry in patients with foveal scars and an eligible retinal locus for better fixation.
A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The acoustic biofeedback training module in the MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment, CenterVue®, Italy) microperimeter was used for training. To determine the treatment efficacy, the following variables were compared before and after testing: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); MAIA microperimeter full threshold 4-2 test parameters of average threshold value, fixation parameters P1 and P2, and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 63% and 95% of fixation points; contrast sensitivity (CSV 1000E Contrast Sensitivity Test); reading speed using the Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test (MNREAD reading chart); and quality of life (NEI-VFQ-25). In addition, fixation stability parameters were recorded during each session.
The study group consisted of 29 patients with a mean age of 68.72±8.34 years. Median BCVA was initially 0.8 (0.2-1.6) logMAR and was 0.8 (0.1-1.6) logMAR after 8 weeks of preferred retinal locus training (p=0.003). The fixation stability parameter P1 improved from a mean of 21.28±3.08% to 32.69±3.69% (p=0.001) while mean P2 improved from 52.79±4.53% to 68.31±3.89% (p=0.001). Mean BCEA 63% decreased from 16.11±2.27 to 13.34±2.26 (p=0.127) and mean BCEA 95% decreased from 45.87±6.72 to 40.01±6.78 (p=0.247) after training. Binocular reading speed was 38.28±6.25 words per minute (wpm) before training and 45.34±7.35 wpm after training (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvement was observed in contrast sensitivity and quality of life questionnaire scores after training.
Beginning with the fifth session, biofeedback training for a new trained retinal locus improved average sensitivity, fixation stability, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and quality of life in patients with macular scarring.
本研究评估了微视野计中使用声反馈训练对有黄斑瘢痕和合适固视点的患者的效果。
共纳入 29 名符合条件的患者。使用 MAIA(黄斑完整性评估,CenterVue®,意大利)微视野计中的声反馈训练模块进行训练。为了确定治疗效果,在测试前后比较了以下变量:最佳矫正视力(BCVA);MAIA 微视野计全阈值 4-2 测试的平均阈值值、固视点参数 P1 和 P2,以及 63%和 95%固视点的双变量轮廓椭圆面积(BCEA);对比敏感度(CSV 1000E 对比敏感度测试);使用明尼苏达州低视力阅读测试(MNREAD 阅读图表)的阅读速度;以及生活质量(NEI-VFQ-25)。此外,还记录了每次治疗期间的固视稳定性参数。
研究组包括 29 名平均年龄为 68.72±8.34 岁的患者。中位 BCVA 初始为 0.8(0.2-1.6)logMAR,8 周后接受最佳固视点训练后为 0.8(0.1-1.6)logMAR(p=0.003)。固视点参数 P1 从平均 21.28±3.08%提高到 32.69±3.69%(p=0.001),而平均 P2 从 52.79±4.53%提高到 68.31±3.89%(p=0.001)。训练后,63%的平均 BCEA 从 16.11±2.27 降至 13.34±2.26(p=0.127),95%的平均 BCEA 从 45.87±6.72 降至 40.01±6.78(p=0.247)。训练前双眼阅读速度为 38.28±6.25 个单词/分钟(wpm),训练后为 45.34±7.35 wpm(p<0.001)。训练后,对比敏感度和生活质量问卷评分均有显著提高。
从第五次治疗开始,针对新训练的固视点的生物反馈训练改善了黄斑瘢痕患者的平均敏感度、固视稳定性、阅读速度、对比敏感度和生活质量。