Moyer Anne, Sohl Stephanie J, Knapp-Oliver Sarah K, Schneider Stefan
Stony Brook University, Department of Psychology, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Aug;35(5):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
The considerable amount of research examining psychosocial interventions for cancer patients makes it important to examine its scope and methodological quality. This comprehensive overview characterizes the field with as few exclusions as possible. A systematic search strategy identified 673 reports comprising 488 unique projects conducted over a 25 year time span. Although the literature on this topic has grown over time, the research was predominantly conducted in the United States (57.0%), largely with breast cancer patients (included in 70.5% of the studies). The intervention approach used most frequently was cognitive behavioral (32.4%), the treatment goal was often improving quality of life generally (69.5%), and the professionals delivering the interventions were typically nurses (29.1%) or psychologists (22.7%). Overall, there was some discrepancy between the types of interventions studied and the types of supportive services available to and sought by cancer patients. Strengths of this research include using randomized designs (62.9%), testing for baseline group equivalence (84.5%), and monitoring treatment, which rose significantly from being used in 48.1-64.4% of projects over time. However, deficiencies in such areas as examining treatment mechanisms and the adequacy of reporting of methodology, essential for useful syntheses of research on these interventions, remain to be addressed. Methodological challenges related to the complexity of this applied research, such as participants seeking treatment outside of research, contamination, and reactions to randomization, also were apparent. Future research could benefit from closer interactions between academic and voluntary sectors and expanding the diversity of participants.
大量针对癌症患者的心理社会干预研究使得审视其范围和方法质量变得很重要。这一全面综述尽可能少地排除相关内容来描述该领域。一项系统检索策略识别出673篇报告,涵盖了在25年时间跨度内开展的488个独特项目。尽管关于这一主题的文献随时间有所增加,但研究主要在美国进行(57.0%),且大多针对乳腺癌患者(70.5%的研究纳入该群体)。最常使用的干预方法是认知行为疗法(32.4%),治疗目标通常是总体改善生活质量(69.5%),提供干预的专业人员通常是护士(29.1%)或心理学家(22.7%)。总体而言,所研究的干预类型与癌症患者可获得及寻求的支持服务类型之间存在一些差异。这项研究的优点包括采用随机设计(62.9%)、对基线组等效性进行测试(84.5%)以及对治疗进行监测,随着时间推移,采用这些方法的项目比例从48.1%至64.4%显著上升。然而,在诸如审视治疗机制以及方法报告的充分性等对于这些干预研究的有效综合至关重要的领域,仍有待解决不足之处。与这类应用研究的复杂性相关的方法学挑战,如参与者在研究之外寻求治疗、污染以及对随机分组的反应等,也很明显。未来的研究可受益于学术部门与志愿部门之间更紧密的互动以及扩大参与者的多样性。