Suppr超能文献

癌症幸存者的心理社会干预:对积极情绪影响的荟萃分析。

Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect.

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):943-955. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00811-8. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Positive affect has demonstrated unique benefits in the context of health-related stress and is emerging as an important target for psychosocial interventions. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether psychosocial interventions increase positive affect in cancer survivors.

METHODS

We coded 28 randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions assessing 2082 cancer survivors from six electronic databases. We calculated 76 effect sizes for positive affect and conducted synthesis using random effects models with robust variance estimation. Tests for moderation included demographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics.

RESULTS

Interventions had a modest effect on positive affect (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.16, 0.54]) with substantial heterogeneity of effects across studies ([Formula: see text]; I = 78%). Three significant moderators were identified: in-person interventions outperformed remote interventions (P = .046), effects were larger when evaluated against standard of care or wait list control conditions versus attentional, educational, or component controls (P = .009), and trials with survivors of early-stage cancer diagnoses yielded larger effects than those with advanced-stage diagnoses (P = .046). We did not detect differential benefits of psychosocial interventions across samples varying in sex, age, on-treatment versus off-treatment status, or cancer type. Although no conclusive evidence suggested outcome reporting biases (P = .370), effects were smaller in studies with lower risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

In-person interventions with survivors of early-stage cancers hold promise for enhancing positive affect, but more methodological rigor is needed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Positive affect strategies can be an explicit target in evidence-based medicine and have a role in patient-centered survivorship care, providing tools to uniquely mobilize human strengths.

摘要

目的

积极情绪在与健康相关的压力方面表现出独特的益处,并且正在成为心理社会干预的重要目标。本研究的主要目的是确定心理社会干预是否会增加癌症幸存者的积极情绪。

方法

我们对 6 个电子数据库中的 28 项心理社会干预随机对照试验进行了编码,共评估了 2082 名癌症幸存者。我们计算了 76 个积极情绪的效应量,并使用具有稳健方差估计的随机效应模型进行了综合分析。对调节因素的检验包括人口统计学、临床和干预特征。

结果

干预措施对积极情绪有适度影响(g=0.35,95%置信区间[0.16,0.54]),但研究之间的效果存在很大的异质性([Formula: see text];I=78%)。确定了三个显著的调节因素:面对面干预优于远程干预(P=0.046),与标准护理或等待对照条件相比,与注意力、教育或组成控制相比,效果更大(P=0.009),早期诊断的癌症幸存者的试验比晚期诊断的癌症幸存者的试验产生更大的效果(P=0.046)。我们没有发现心理社会干预在性别、年龄、治疗中和治疗后状态或癌症类型不同的样本中具有不同的益处。尽管没有确凿的证据表明结果报告存在偏倚(P=0.370),但低偏倚风险的研究中效果较小。

结论

针对早期癌症幸存者的面对面干预可能有望增强积极情绪,但需要更严格的方法学。

对癌症幸存者的意义

积极情绪策略可以成为循证医学中的明确目标,并在以患者为中心的生存护理中发挥作用,为独特地调动人类力量提供工具。

相似文献

1
Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect.
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):943-955. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00811-8. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
6
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 24;2013(12):CD008529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529.pub3.
8
Quality of life in "chronic" cancer survivors: a meta-analysis.
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Aug;14(4):504-517. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00869-9. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

6
Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Perspectives on Cancer's Impact on Different Life Areas Post-Treatment: A Qualitative Study.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024 Oct;13(5):748-759. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0021. Epub 2024 May 2.
8
Biographical Renewal and its Facilitators in Cancer Survivorship: A Conceptual Paper.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Jan-Mar;30(1):16-20. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_332_2023. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):57-71. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1332. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Estimation of Symptom Severity During Chemotherapy From Passively Sensed Data: Exploratory Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 19;19(12):e420. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9046.
4
Suffering in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Control Trial of a Narrative Intervention.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):200-207. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention for people newly diagnosed with HIV.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):409-423. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000188. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Basics of meta-analysis: I is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity.
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Finding peace in clinical settings: A narrative review of concept and practice.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Aug;15(4):490-498. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000924. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
10
Brief psychological intervention in patients with cervical cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
Health Psychol. 2016 Dec;35(12):1383-1391. doi: 10.1037/hea0000407. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验