Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜结直肠手术中“转换”的定义是什么?

What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL 33331, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0329-2. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A web-based survey was conducted among colorectal surgeons who represented members of both SAGES and ASCRS to find out how they define conversion for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Questionnaires were designed based on MCQs, including three parts: surgeon information, different definitions for conversion, and four different clinical scenarios. Surgeons were asked to choose the best definition(s).

RESULTS

325 (28.5%) of 1,140 surgeons, 28.5% responded; approximately half of them were part of private-based practices. Fifty-three percent had more than 10 years experience; 35.9% performed more than 50 laparoscopic colon cases per year, 12% performed more than 25 laparoscopic rectal cases per year, and 60% less than 10. The majority (68.4%) agreed that any incision made earlier than planned is conversion. Whereas 81.4% felt that incision >5 cm is not a conversion, only 53.4% considered incision >10 cm a conversion, and 37% did not. Neither extracorporeal vessel ligation (73.8%), bowel resection (81.2%), anastomosis (77%), or incision made for specimen retrieval (91.1%) was counted as conversion. In clinical case scenarios, 62% found an incision made to facilitate phlegmon dissection after laparoscopically mobilizing the left colon up to and around the splenic flexure to be laparoscopic-assisted. A 10-cm incision required for fistula take down after finishing laparoscopic dissection was defined as conversion (55.6%). A 10-cm incision made for the rectal dissection in rectopexy was described as conversion in 51% and laparoscopic-assisted in 48%. Increasing a 5-12-cm for specimen extraction, 49.3% was declared a laparoscopic-assisted case.

CONCLUSIONS

It was considered clear that any incision made earlier than planned a conversion, whereas extra corporeal vessel ligation, bowel resection and anastomosis were not. However, there seem to be many views of conversion regarding incision length, and some clinical situations that might influence outcome among different centers.

摘要

背景

一项基于网络的调查在 SAGES 和 ASCRS 的结直肠外科医生中进行,以了解他们如何定义腹腔镜结直肠手术的中转。

方法

问卷设计基于 MCQs,包括三部分:外科医生信息、不同的中转定义和四个不同的临床场景。外科医生被要求选择最佳的定义。

结果

在 1140 名外科医生中,有 325 名(28.5%)做出了回应;其中约一半来自私人诊所。53%的人有超过 10 年的经验;35.9%的人每年进行超过 50 例腹腔镜结肠手术,12%的人每年进行超过 25 例腹腔镜直肠手术,而 60%的人每年进行不到 10 例。大多数(68.4%)人认为任何早于计划的切口都是中转。虽然 81.4%的人认为切口>5cm 不是中转,但只有 53.4%的人认为切口>10cm 是中转,37%的人不认为是。体外血管结扎(73.8%)、肠切除(81.2%)、吻合(77%)或为取出标本而做的切口(91.1%)都不被认为是中转。在临床案例场景中,62%的人认为在腹腔镜游离左半结肠并围绕脾曲移动后,为便于切开脓肿而做的切口是腹腔镜辅助的。完成腹腔镜解剖后,为处理瘘管而下的 10cm 切口被定义为中转(55.6%)。直肠固定术时为直肠解剖做的 10cm 切口,51%的人认为是中转,48%的人认为是腹腔镜辅助。为取出标本而扩大 5-12cm 的切口,49.3%的人认为是腹腔镜辅助的情况。

结论

任何早于计划的切口都被认为是中转,而体外血管结扎、肠切除和吻合则不是。然而,对于切口长度和一些可能影响不同中心结果的临床情况,似乎有许多关于中转的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验