Maurea S, Caleo O, Mollica C, Imbriaco M, Mainenti P P, Palumbo C, Mancini M, Camera L, Salvatore M
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomorfologiche e Funzionali (DSBMF), Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy.
Radiol Med. 2009 Apr;114(3):390-402. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0374-x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
The aim of this study was to directly compare the results of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with those of ultrasonography (US) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary diseases.
A total of 70 patients (41 men, 29 women) aged 22-89 years were studied either before (n=59) or after cholecystectomy (n=11) for biliary lithiasis. Clinical signs and symptoms were jaundice (n=15), abdominal pain (n=37) and proven biliary lithiasis (n=18). MRCP was performed in all patients, whereas abdominal US was performed in 55 (group 1) and MSCT in 37 (group 2) patients. A regional evaluation of the main structures of the pancreaticobiliary system was performed: gallbladder and cystic duct, intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts and main pancreatic duct. Histology (n=27), biopsy (n=5), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=28) and/or clinical-imaging follow-up (n=10) were considered standards of reference. In particular, patients were classified as showing benign (n=47) or malignant (n=12) lesions or normal biliary anatomy (n=11).
In group 1, the results of MRCP and US were concordant in the majority (92%) of cases; however, statistically significant discordance (p<0.01) was found in the evaluation of the extrahepatic ducts, with nine cases (16%) of middle-distal common bile duct stones being detected on MRCP only. In group 2, the results of MRCP and MSCT were also concordant in most cases (87%). However, findings were significantly discordant when the intra- and extrahepatic ducts were analysed, with seven (19%) and six (16%) cases, respectively, of lithiasis being detected on MRCP only (p<0.01 for both).
The results of our study confirm the diagnostic potential of MRCP in the study of the pancreaticobiliary duct system. In particular, the comparison between MRCP and US and MSCT indicates the superiority of MRCP in evaluating bile ducts and detecting stones in the common bile duct.
本研究旨在直接比较磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与超声检查(US)及多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)在诊断胰胆疾病方面的结果。
共研究了70例年龄在22至89岁之间的患者(41例男性,29例女性),其中59例为胆石症患者在胆囊切除术前进行研究,11例为胆囊切除术后进行研究。临床症状和体征包括黄疸(15例)、腹痛(37例)及确诊的胆石症(18例)。所有患者均进行了MRCP检查,55例患者进行了腹部超声检查(第1组),37例患者进行了MSCT检查(第2组)。对胰胆系统的主要结构进行了区域评估:胆囊和胆囊管、肝内和肝外胆管以及主胰管。组织学检查(27例)、活检(5例)、内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)(28例)和/或临床影像学随访(10例)被视为参考标准。具体而言,患者被分类为表现为良性(47例)或恶性(12例)病变或正常胆管解剖结构(11例)。
在第1组中,MRCP和US的结果在大多数(92%)病例中是一致的;然而,在肝外胆管评估中发现了具有统计学意义的不一致(p<0.01),仅在MRCP上检测到9例(16%)中远端胆总管结石。在第2组中,MRCP和MSCT的结果在大多数情况下(87%)也是一致的。然而,在分析肝内和肝外胆管时,结果存在显著差异,分别有7例(19%)和6例(16%)结石仅在MRCP上被检测到(两者p均<0.01)。
我们的研究结果证实了MRCP在胰胆管系统研究中的诊断潜力。特别是,MRCP与US和MSCT的比较表明,MRCP在评估胆管和检测胆总管结石方面具有优越性。