Suppr超能文献

整体公正判断在组织公正研究中的作用:中介作用检验

The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation.

作者信息

Ambrose Maureen L, Schminke Marshall

机构信息

Department of Management, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32813-1400, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):491-500. doi: 10.1037/a0013203.

Abstract

Organizational justice research traditionally focuses on the unique predictability of different types of justice (distributive, procedural, and interactional) and the relative importance of these types of justice on outcome variables. Recently, researchers have suggested shifting from this focus on specific types of justice to a consideration of overall justice. The authors hypothesize that overall justice judgments mediate the relationship between specific justice facets and outcomes. They present 2 studies to test this hypothesis. Study 1 demonstrates that overall justice judgments mediate the relationship between specific justice judgments and employee attitudes. Study 2 demonstrates the mediating relationship holds for supervisor ratings of employee behavior. Implications for research on organizational justice are discussed.

摘要

组织公正研究传统上侧重于不同类型公正(分配公正、程序公正和互动公正)的独特可预测性,以及这些类型的公正在结果变量上的相对重要性。最近,研究人员建议从关注特定类型的公正转向考虑整体公正。作者假设整体公正判断在特定公正维度与结果之间的关系中起中介作用。他们提出了两项研究来检验这一假设。研究1表明整体公正判断在特定公正判断与员工态度之间的关系中起中介作用。研究2表明这种中介关系在主管对员工行为的评价中也成立。文中还讨论了对组织公正研究的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验