Domini Fulvio, Caudek Corrado
Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
J Vis. 2009 Feb 27;9(2):25.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.2.25.
The Intrinsic Constraint (IC) model of depth-cue integration (F. Domini, C. Caudek, & H. Tassinari, 2006) posits a strong link between perceived depth and depth discrimination, much like some Fechnerian theories of sensory scaling. K. J. MacKenzie, R. F. Murray, and L. M. Wilcox (2008) tested the IC model by examining whether two depth-matched pairs of stimuli are separated by equal numbers of Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs) in depth. They concluded that "IC is inconsistent with the psychophysics of depth perception." Here, by using a different methodological approach, we provide empirical findings that are consistent with the predictions of the IC model. We also discuss the relative merits of the IC and Modified Weak Fusion (MWF) models (M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston, & M. Young, 1995) of depth-cue combination.
深度线索整合的内在约束(IC)模型(F.多米尼、C.考德克和H.塔西纳里,2006)假定在感知深度和深度辨别之间存在紧密联系,这与一些费希纳式的感觉量表理论颇为相似。K.J.麦肯齐、R.F.默里和L.M.威尔科克斯(2008)通过检验两对深度匹配的刺激在深度上是否被相等数量的恰可察觉差异(JND)分隔,对IC模型进行了测试。他们得出结论:“IC与深度感知的心理物理学不一致。”在此,通过使用不同的方法论途径,我们提供了与IC模型预测相符的实证研究结果。我们还讨论了深度线索组合的IC模型和修正弱融合(MWF)模型(M.S.兰迪、L.T.马洛尼、E.B.约翰斯顿和M.杨,1995)的相对优点。