Beeton Michael L, Chalker Victoria J, Maxwell Nicola C, Kotecha Sailesh, Spiller O Brad
Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Dept. of Child Health, 5th Floor, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):2020-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01349-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Antibiotic resistance determination of Ureaplasma spp. (Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum) usually requires predetermination of bacterial titer, followed by antibiotic interrogation using a set bacterial input. This 96-well method allows simultaneous quantification of bacteria in the presence and absence of antibiotics. A method for determining precise MICs and a method for screening against multiple antibiotics using breakpoint thresholds are detailed. Of the 61 Ureaplasma-positive clinical isolates screened, one (1.6%) was resistant to erythromycin (MIC, >64 mg/liter) and clarithromycin (MIC, 4 mg/liter), one to ciprofloxacin (1.6%), and one to tetracycline/doxycycline (1.6%). Five isolates were also consistently found to have an elevated MIC of 8 mg/liter for erythromycin, but this may not represent true antibiotic resistance, as no mutations were found in the 23S rRNA operons or ribosome-associated L4 and L22 proteins for these strains. However, two amino acids (R66Q67) were deleted from the L4 protein of the erythromycin-/clarithromycin-resistant strain. The tetM genetic element was detected in the tetracycline-resistant clinical isolate as well as in the positive control Vancouver strain serotype 9. The tetM gene was also found in a fully tetracycline-susceptible Ureaplasma clinical isolate, and no mutations were found in the coding region that would explain its failure to mediate tetracycline resistance. An amino acid substitution (D82N) was found in the ParC subunit of the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate, adjacent to the S83L mutation reported by other investigators in many ciprofloxacin-resistant Ureaplasma isolates. It is now possible to detect antibiotic resistance in Ureaplasma within 48 h of positive culture without prior knowledge of bacterial load, identifying them for further molecular analysis.
解脲脲原体(微小脲原体和解脲脲原体)的抗生素耐药性测定通常需要预先测定细菌滴度,然后使用固定的细菌接种量进行抗生素检测。这种96孔法可同时定量存在和不存在抗生素时的细菌数量。详细介绍了一种确定精确最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的方法以及一种使用断点阈值筛选多种抗生素的方法。在筛选的61株解脲脲原体阳性临床分离株中,一株(1.6%)对红霉素(MIC,>64mg/L)和克拉霉素(MIC,4mg/L)耐药,一株对环丙沙星耐药(1.6%),一株对四环素/强力霉素耐药(1.6%)。还始终发现5株分离株对红霉素的MIC升高至8mg/L,但这可能并不代表真正的抗生素耐药性,因为在这些菌株的23S rRNA操纵子或核糖体相关的L4和L22蛋白中未发现突变。然而,在对红霉素/克拉霉素耐药菌株的L4蛋白中缺失了两个氨基酸(R66Q67)。在四环素耐药临床分离株以及阳性对照温哥华9型血清型菌株中检测到tetM遗传元件。在一株对四环素完全敏感的解脲脲原体临床分离株中也发现了tetM基因,并且在编码区未发现可解释其未能介导四环素耐药性的突变。在对环丙沙星耐药的分离株的ParC亚基中发现了一个氨基酸替代(D82N),与其他研究人员在许多对环丙沙星耐药的解脲脲原体分离株中报道的S83L突变相邻。现在有可能在阳性培养48小时内检测解脲脲原体中的抗生素耐药性,而无需事先了解细菌载量,从而识别它们以便进行进一步的分子分析。