Suppr超能文献

大学生中分裂型人格问卷四因素结构的验证

Confirmation of a four-factor structure of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire among undergraduate students.

作者信息

Compton Michael T, Goulding Sandra M, Bakeman Roger, McClure-Tone Erin B

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2009 Jun;111(1-3):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.02.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although several exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses have supported the initially proposed factor structure of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) in which its nine subscales are grouped into cognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized domains, others have revealed different latent structures. This study determined the best-fitting factor structure from among five models that have been proposed in the literature, as well as five additional hierarchically related models.

METHODS

Undergraduate college students (n=825) completed the SPQ as well as the Perceptual Aberration Scale (PAS) and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS). Confirmatory factor analyses involving the nine SPQ subscales were conducted using the Linear Structural Relations Program (LISREL 8.72).

RESULTS

The best fitting model was a previously described 4-factor model including cognitive-perceptual, paranoid, negative, and disorganized domains. Correlations between the derived SPQ domains and the PAS score ranged r=.26-.39, and correlations between the SPQ domains and the SAS ranged r=.07-.41.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings support a 4-factor model over the standard 3-factor model that is typically used to derive SPQ subscale scores. The four derived domains are minimally to moderately correlated with other measures of psychosis-proneness.

摘要

目的

尽管多项探索性和验证性因素分析支持了分裂型人格问卷(SPQ)最初提出的因素结构,即其九个分量表被分为认知-感知、人际和紊乱领域,但也有其他研究揭示了不同的潜在结构。本研究从文献中提出的五个模型以及另外五个层次相关模型中确定了最佳拟合因素结构。

方法

大学生(n = 825)完成了SPQ以及感知偏差量表(PAS)和修订版社交快感缺乏量表(SAS)。使用线性结构关系程序(LISREL 8.72)对九个SPQ分量表进行验证性因素分析。

结果

最佳拟合模型是先前描述的四因素模型,包括认知-感知、偏执、消极和紊乱领域。派生的SPQ领域与PAS得分之间的相关性范围为r = 0.26 - 0.39,SPQ领域与SAS之间的相关性范围为r = 0.07 - 0.41。

结论

目前的研究结果支持四因素模型,而非通常用于得出SPQ分量表分数的标准三因素模型。派生的四个领域与其他精神病倾向测量指标的相关性最小至中等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验