Suppr超能文献

[外周动脉疾病慢性缺血性疼痛的定量感觉测试与神经性疼痛问卷之间的相关性]

[Correlation between quantitative sensory testing and questionnaires on neuropathic pain for chronic ischemic pain in peripheral arterial disease].

作者信息

Lang P M, Rüger L J, Abahji T, Hoffmann U, Crispin A, Irnich D

机构信息

Interdisziplinäre Schmerzambulanz, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum Innenstadt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2009 Jun;23(3):251-4, 256-8. doi: 10.1007/s00482-009-0773-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A neuropathic component to chronic ischemic pain in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has recently been shown using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and pain questionnaires. The aim of this study was to examine correlations between QST and pain questionnaires in patients with chronic ischemic pain.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients with severe PAD (Fontaine stages III and IV) without diabetes mellitus answered a questionnaire and were examined with QST. The questionnaire consisted of several validated instruments which were used to examine the intensity of pain, quality of pain and neuropathic pain (VAS, SF-MPQ, S-LANSS, NPSI).

RESULTS

The results of the QST confirmed previously published data. Several terms of the SF-MPQ showed a correlation with parameters of the QST, such as Allodynia (QST) which correlated with the term tender (SF-MPQ) (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.911; p< or =0.001) and the NPSI subscore evoked pain correlated with the QST parameter wind-up ratio (0.683; p=0.042).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that there might be correlations between psychophysical tests (QST) and pain questionnaires. Subjective perceptions of pain might be represented by a certain pattern in the QST. These connections could contribute to further clarify the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to the perception of pain.

摘要

背景

最近通过定量感觉测试(QST)和疼痛问卷显示,外周动脉疾病(PAD)慢性缺血性疼痛存在神经病理性成分。本研究旨在探讨慢性缺血性疼痛患者中QST与疼痛问卷之间的相关性。

方法

共有10例无糖尿病的重度PAD患者(Fontaine III期和IV期)回答了问卷并接受QST检查。问卷由几种经过验证的工具组成,用于检查疼痛强度、疼痛性质和神经病理性疼痛(视觉模拟评分法、简化McGill疼痛问卷、利兹神经病理性疼痛筛查量表、神经病理性疼痛症状问卷)。

结果

QST结果证实了先前发表的数据。简化McGill疼痛问卷的几个条目与QST参数显示出相关性,如异常性疼痛(QST)与“压痛”条目(简化McGill疼痛问卷)相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数0.911;p≤0.001),神经病理性疼痛症状问卷诱发疼痛子评分与QST参数累积比率相关(0.683;p = 0.042)。

结论

结果表明,心理物理学测试(QST)与疼痛问卷之间可能存在相关性。疼痛的主观感受可能由QST中的某种模式表现出来。这些联系可能有助于进一步阐明导致疼痛感知的病理生理机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验