Backonja Miroslav-Misha, Walk David, Edwards Robert R, Sehgal Nalini, Moeller-Bertram Toby, Wasan Ajay, Irving Gordon, Argoff Charles, Wallace Mark
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):641-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a68c7e.
Neuropathic pain disorders are usually characterized by spontaneous ongoing or intermittent symptoms, stimulus-evoked positive sensory phenomena, and negative sensory phenomena. Spontaneous individual subject specific phenomena are identified in the neurologic history and are quantifiable by means of self-reported neuropathic pain symptoms tools such as scales, inventories, and questionnaires. Negative and positive sensory phenomena are assessed by the neurologic bedside examination and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which refers to psychophysical tests of sensory perception during the administration of stimuli with predetermined physical properties and following specific protocols. QST is able to capture and quantify stimulus-evoked negative and positive sensory phenomena, and as such should become standard if not a critical tool in neuropathic pain research and practice. Although the advent of anatomic and functional imaging modalities is revolutionizing our understanding of the mechanisms of neuropathic pain, only by anchoring such test results to individual subjects' own perceptions via QST can they provide meaningful information about neuropathic pain, which is based on perceptual experience. To yield useful results, QST requires a cooperative subject and carefully standardized methods, including standardization of the stimulus parameters as well as the testing environment, instructions, and evaluation methods. This manuscript provides a concise review of fundamental concepts necessary for understanding the role of QST in the process of eliciting information about sensory abnormalities associated with neuropathic pain and the place of that information in analysis of pain mechanisms. Together with the companion manuscript, this review provides definitions that should help further the use of QST as a diagnostic tool as well.
神经性疼痛障碍通常具有持续性或间歇性自发症状、刺激诱发的阳性感觉现象和阴性感觉现象等特征。个体自发的特定现象可在神经病史中识别,并可通过自我报告的神经性疼痛症状工具进行量化,如量表、清单和问卷。阴性和阳性感觉现象通过床边神经学检查和定量感觉测试(QST)进行评估,QST是指在给予具有预定物理特性的刺激并遵循特定方案时对感觉知觉进行的心理物理学测试。QST能够捕捉和量化刺激诱发的阴性和阳性感觉现象,因此,如果不是神经性疼痛研究和实践中的关键工具,也应成为标准工具。尽管解剖学和功能成像模式的出现正在彻底改变我们对神经性疼痛机制的理解,但只有通过QST将这些测试结果与个体自身的感知联系起来,它们才能提供有关基于感知体验的神经性疼痛的有意义信息。为了产生有用的结果,QST需要受试者的配合以及仔细标准化的方法,包括刺激参数以及测试环境、指导和评估方法的标准化。本手稿简要回顾了理解QST在获取与神经性疼痛相关的感觉异常信息过程中的作用以及该信息在疼痛机制分析中的地位所需的基本概念。与配套手稿一起,本综述提供的定义也应有助于进一步将QST用作诊断工具。