Hesterberg Thomas W, Long Christopher M, Bunn William B, Sax Sonja N, Lapin Charles A, Valberg Peter A
Navistar, Inc., Warrenville, Illinois 60555, USA.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(3):195-227. doi: 10.1080/10408440802220603.
We reviewed laboratory and clinical studies bearing on the non-cancer health effects of diesel exhaust (DE) published since the 2002 release of the US EPA Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust. We critically evaluated over 100 published articles on experimental research, focusing on their value for predicting the risk of non-cancer health effects in humans exposed to DE. Human controlled-exposure studies provide new evidence of lung inflammatory effects and thrombogenic and ischemic effects of inhaled DE, albeit for older-model diesel engines and concentrations that are much higher (approximately 300 microg/m(3)) than typical ambient or even occupational levels. Recent animal studies provide insight into the potential mechanisms underlying observed respiratory and cardiovascular health responses; however, because of unrealistically high DE concentrations, the mechanisms elucidated in these studies may not be relevant at lower DE exposure levels. Although larger in number, and suggestive of possible mechanisms for non-cancer health effects at elevated DE levels, interpretation of this recent group of clinical-study findings and laboratory-animal results remains hindered by inconsistencies and variability in outcomes, potentially irrelevant DE-exposure compositions, limitations in exposure protocols and pathways, and uncertainties in extrapolation and generalization. A mechanism of action that allows reliable prediction of adverse health effects at DE-exposure levels typical of the present-day ambient and occupational environment has not emerged. Because of changing diesel-engine technology, inhalation studies using realistic environmental and occupational exposures of new-technology diesel exhaust are of critical importance.
我们回顾了自2002年美国环境保护局发布《柴油机尾气健康评估文件》以来发表的关于柴油机尾气(DE)对非癌症健康影响的实验室和临床研究。我们严格评估了100多篇关于实验研究的已发表文章,重点关注它们在预测接触DE的人群中非癌症健康影响风险方面的价值。人体对照暴露研究提供了新的证据,证明吸入DE会产生肺部炎症效应以及血栓形成和缺血效应,尽管这些研究针对的是老式柴油发动机,且暴露浓度(约300微克/立方米)远高于典型的环境水平甚至职业暴露水平。最近的动物研究深入探讨了观察到的呼吸和心血管健康反应背后的潜在机制;然而,由于DE浓度过高不切实际,这些研究中阐明的机制可能与较低的DE暴露水平无关。尽管近期这组临床研究结果和实验室动物实验结果数量较多,且提示了DE浓度升高时非癌症健康影响的可能机制,但对这些结果的解释仍受到结果的不一致性和变异性、潜在不相关的DE暴露成分、暴露方案和途径的局限性以及外推和归纳的不确定性的阻碍。尚未出现一种能够可靠预测当今环境和职业环境中典型DE暴露水平下不良健康影响的作用机制。由于柴油发动机技术不断变化,使用新技术柴油机尾气进行实际环境和职业暴露的吸入研究至关重要。